Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

“No, I’m Willing to Listen” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of the Right to Remain Silent (and Rule 403 Redaction Requests Do Not Preserve Confrontation Clause Claims)

“No, I’m Willing to Listen” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of the Right to Remain Silent (and Rule 403 Redaction Requests Do Not Preserve Confrontation Clause Claims)

Date: Apr 22, 2026
“No, I’m Willing to Listen” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of the Right to Remain Silent (and Rule 403 Redaction Requests Do Not Preserve Confrontation Clause Claims) Case: United States v. Amos...
Mandatory Life Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) Remains Enforceable After the First Step Act, and Equal-Protection Attacks Fail on Plain-Error Review

Mandatory Life Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) Remains Enforceable After the First Step Act, and Equal-Protection Attacks Fail on Plain-Error Review

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Mandatory Life Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) Remains Enforceable After the First Step Act, and Equal-Protection Attacks Fail on Plain-Error Review I. Introduction In United States v. Christopher...
Exhibits as Pleading Admissions and the Post-Judgment Cutoff for Rule 15 Amendments in Insurance Coverage Suits

Exhibits as Pleading Admissions and the Post-Judgment Cutoff for Rule 15 Amendments in Insurance Coverage Suits

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Exhibits as Pleading Admissions and the Post-Judgment Cutoff for Rule 15 Amendments in Insurance Coverage Suits 1. Introduction In Sara Meir v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, No....
Felon-in-Possession Challenges in the Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Constitutional After Bruen and Rahimi Under Binding Prior-Panel Precedent

Felon-in-Possession Challenges in the Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Constitutional After Bruen and Rahimi Under Binding Prior-Panel Precedent

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Felon-in-Possession Challenges in the Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Constitutional After Bruen and Rahimi Under Binding Prior-Panel Precedent 1. Introduction United States v. Eibe Scott (11th...
Serial Removal Barred: Federal Courts May Sua Sponte Remand Removed Ejectment Actions that Violate a Pre‑Filing Injunction, and FIRREA § 1821(j) Does Not Shield Such Conduct

Serial Removal Barred: Federal Courts May Sua Sponte Remand Removed Ejectment Actions that Violate a Pre‑Filing Injunction, and FIRREA § 1821(j) Does Not Shield Such Conduct

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Serial Removal Barred: Federal Courts May Sua Sponte Remand Removed Ejectment Actions that Violate a Pre‑Filing Injunction, and FIRREA § 1821(j) Does Not Shield Such Conduct 1. Introduction Case:...
Sovereign-Immunity Dismissals Are Jurisdictional and Must Be Without Prejudice (11th Cir.)

Sovereign-Immunity Dismissals Are Jurisdictional and Must Be Without Prejudice (11th Cir.)

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Sovereign-Immunity Dismissals Are Jurisdictional and Must Be Without Prejudice (11th Cir.) 1. Introduction In Robert Walker v. Brett Michael Waronicki (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) (per curiam; not for...
Rescinded Transfers and Vague Comparators Do Not Create a Triable Title VII Case; Untimely § 1983 Claims Are Barred Absent Post-Limitations Acts

Rescinded Transfers and Vague Comparators Do Not Create a Triable Title VII Case; Untimely § 1983 Claims Are Barred Absent Post-Limitations Acts

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Rescinded Transfers and Vague Comparators Do Not Create a Triable Title VII Case; Untimely § 1983 Claims Are Barred Absent Post-Limitations Acts I. Introduction In Elnoria Howell v. Baldwin County...
Post-Erlinger ACCA Limits and Clerical-Error Remands: § 924(e) Cannot Appear in the Judgment When the ACCA Was Not Triggered

Post-Erlinger ACCA Limits and Clerical-Error Remands: § 924(e) Cannot Appear in the Judgment When the ACCA Was Not Triggered

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Post-Erlinger ACCA Limits and Clerical-Error Remands: § 924(e) Cannot Appear in the Judgment When the ACCA Was Not Triggered I. Introduction United States v. Nathaniel Broughton (11th Cir. Apr. 17,...
Amendment 833 Is Substantive (Not Clarifying) and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Jurisdiction Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus

Amendment 833 Is Substantive (Not Clarifying) and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Jurisdiction Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Amendment 833 Is Substantive (Not Clarifying) and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Jurisdiction Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus Introduction United States v. Angelo Martinez is a...
Reaffirming MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach (Including Foreign EEZs) and Denying Mitigating-Role Relief to Vessel Captains Despite the 2025 § 2D1.1(e) “Low-Level Function” Guidance

Reaffirming MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach (Including Foreign EEZs) and Denying Mitigating-Role Relief to Vessel Captains Despite the 2025 § 2D1.1(e) “Low-Level Function” Guidance

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Reaffirming MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach (Including Foreign EEZs) and Denying Mitigating-Role Relief to Vessel Captains Despite the 2025 § 2D1.1(e) “Low-Level Function” Guidance I. Introduction...
Off-Premises Sign Limits Are Content-Neutral; Standing Confines Facial Attacks to the Enforced Provision

Off-Premises Sign Limits Are Content-Neutral; Standing Confines Facial Attacks to the Enforced Provision

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Off-Premises Sign Limits Are Content-Neutral; Standing Confines Facial Attacks to the Enforced Provision Case: Geoffrey Anderson v. City of Atlanta, Georgia (No. 24-13509) Court: United States Court...
Eleventh Circuit: Tortious Cease-and-Desist Letters and Personal-Capacity Targeting Defeat the Corporate Shield and Establish Specific Jurisdiction

Eleventh Circuit: Tortious Cease-and-Desist Letters and Personal-Capacity Targeting Defeat the Corporate Shield and Establish Specific Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Eleventh Circuit: Tortious Cease-and-Desist Letters and Personal-Capacity Targeting Defeat the Corporate Shield and Establish Specific Jurisdiction I. Introduction Case: Frida Kahlo Corporation v....
Florida Lemon Law: § 681.104(3) Presumptions Are Non-Mandatory; § 681.104(1) Notice Thresholds Are Strict

Florida Lemon Law: § 681.104(3) Presumptions Are Non-Mandatory; § 681.104(1) Notice Thresholds Are Strict

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Florida Lemon Law: § 681.104(3) Presumptions Are Non-Mandatory; § 681.104(1) Notice Thresholds Are Strict I. Introduction Case: Kevin Joyce v. Forest River, Inc., No. 24-12819 (11th Cir. Apr. 17,...
Harmless-Error Review Requires a Clear Keene Statement When a Court Erroneously Denies the Third Acceptance Point Under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)

Harmless-Error Review Requires a Clear Keene Statement When a Court Erroneously Denies the Third Acceptance Point Under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Harmless-Error Review Requires a Clear Keene Statement When a Court Erroneously Denies the Third Acceptance Point Under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) 1. Introduction In United States v. Jason Edward Lopez...
§ 4243 Commitment After NGRI: Verbal Threats, Episodic Bipolar Disorder, and Release-Plan Instability Can Support “Substantial Risk”

§ 4243 Commitment After NGRI: Verbal Threats, Episodic Bipolar Disorder, and Release-Plan Instability Can Support “Substantial Risk”

Date: Apr 20, 2026
§ 4243 Commitment After NGRI: Verbal Threats, Episodic Bipolar Disorder, and Release-Plan Instability Can Support “Substantial Risk” Case: United States v. Joshua Richard Potenza (11th Cir. Apr. 17,...
Mandatory-Minimum-Controlled Sentencing: No Plain Error for Not Orally Stating a Supplanted Guideline Range; Upward Variance Sustained

Mandatory-Minimum-Controlled Sentencing: No Plain Error for Not Orally Stating a Supplanted Guideline Range; Upward Variance Sustained

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Mandatory-Minimum-Controlled Sentencing: No Plain Error for Not Orally Stating a Supplanted Guideline Range; Upward Variance Sustained Introduction In United States v. Rickey Lee Miller, Jr. (11th...
United States v. Chalifoux: No Sua Sponte Duty to Solicit Defendant Testimony at a Sell Hearing; Uncontroverted Expert Evidence Supports Involuntary Medication

United States v. Chalifoux: No Sua Sponte Duty to Solicit Defendant Testimony at a Sell Hearing; Uncontroverted Expert Evidence Supports Involuntary Medication

Date: Apr 20, 2026
No Sua Sponte Duty to Solicit Defendant Testimony at a Sell Hearing; Uncontroverted Expert Evidence Supports Involuntary Medication 1. Introduction In United States v. Shawn Michael Chalifoux (11th...
ERISA LTD Benefits May Cease for Failure to Provide Objective Proof of Continued Disability Required by Plan Terms

ERISA LTD Benefits May Cease for Failure to Provide Objective Proof of Continued Disability Required by Plan Terms

Date: Apr 20, 2026
ERISA LTD Benefits May Cease for Failure to Provide Objective Proof of Continued Disability Required by Plan Terms 1. Introduction Bryce Dunham-Zemberi v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Convictions Without U.S. Nexus and Upholds Upward Variance Based on Specific Deterrence

Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Convictions Without U.S. Nexus and Upholds Upward Variance Based on Specific Deterrence

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Convictions Without U.S. Nexus and Upholds Upward Variance Based on Specific Deterrence Introduction In United States v. Winston Pinnock (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) (per...
Amendment 833 Is Substantive and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus

Amendment 833 Is Substantive and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Amendment 833 Is Substantive and Non-Retroactive on Direct Appeal; MDLEA Applies in Foreign EEZs Without a U.S. Nexus I. Introduction This consolidated Eleventh Circuit decision arises from Maritime...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert