Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Hodzic v. Bondi — Statutory “Exceptional Circumstances” Do Not Govern BIA Sua Sponte Reopening, and Niz-Chavez Does Not Compel Reopening

Hodzic v. Bondi — Statutory “Exceptional Circumstances” Do Not Govern BIA Sua Sponte Reopening, and Niz-Chavez Does Not Compel Reopening

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Hodzic v. Bondi — Statutory “Exceptional Circumstances” Do Not Govern BIA Sua Sponte Reopening, and Niz-Chavez Does Not Compel Reopening 1. Introduction In Hodzic v. Bondi (1st Cir. Mar. 19, 2026),...
Police “Wanted Posters” Do Not Trigger the Federal Sixth Amendment Speedy-Trial Clock; In Massachusetts, the Clock Starts at Arrest/Indictment, Not at Complaint

Police “Wanted Posters” Do Not Trigger the Federal Sixth Amendment Speedy-Trial Clock; In Massachusetts, the Clock Starts at Arrest/Indictment, Not at Complaint

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Police “Wanted Posters” Do Not Trigger the Federal Sixth Amendment Speedy-Trial Clock; In Massachusetts, the Clock Starts at Arrest/Indictment, Not at Complaint 1. Introduction Carr v. Lizotte (1st...
Narrigan v. Goldberg — Ripeness and Standing Limits for Takings Challenges to Unclaimed-Property Interest Regimes

Narrigan v. Goldberg — Ripeness and Standing Limits for Takings Challenges to Unclaimed-Property Interest Regimes

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Narrigan v. Goldberg: Takings Challenges to Unclaimed-Property Interest Are (i) Unripe Before a Claim-and-Refusal and (ii) Cannot Support Prospective Relief Once the Alleged Taking Is Complete...
Delegation Clauses and Equitable Estoppel Do Not Let a Signatory Force a Nonsignatory Courier Into Arbitration When the Contract Is Only With the Courier’s LLC

Delegation Clauses and Equitable Estoppel Do Not Let a Signatory Force a Nonsignatory Courier Into Arbitration When the Contract Is Only With the Courier’s LLC

Date: Mar 19, 2026
Delegation Clauses and Equitable Estoppel Do Not Let a Signatory Force a Nonsignatory Courier Into Arbitration When the Contract Is Only With the Courier’s LLC I. Introduction Abdisalam v. Strategic...
Overwhelming Evidence Renders Alleged “Overview” and Prejudicial-Background Testimony Harmless in Money-Laundering Conspiracy Trials

Overwhelming Evidence Renders Alleged “Overview” and Prejudicial-Background Testimony Harmless in Money-Laundering Conspiracy Trials

Date: Mar 19, 2026
Overwhelming Evidence Renders Alleged “Overview” and Prejudicial-Background Testimony Harmless in Money-Laundering Conspiracy Trials Case: United States v. Figueroa (1st Cir. Mar. 17, 2026) (Not for...
Categorical Funding Freezes Are Reviewable and Likely Arbitrary, but APA Courts Cannot Order Grant/Contract Payments (Tucker Act Limit)

Categorical Funding Freezes Are Reviewable and Likely Arbitrary, but APA Courts Cannot Order Grant/Contract Payments (Tucker Act Limit)

Date: Mar 18, 2026
Categorical Funding Freezes Are Reviewable and Likely Arbitrary, but APA Courts Cannot Order Grant/Contract Payments (Tucker Act Limit) Introduction In State of New York v. Trump (1st Cir. Mar. 16,...
Rescission-in-Name-Only Does Not Moot a De Facto Federal Funding Freeze; APA Injunctions May Bar Categorical Freezes but Generally May Not Compel Grant/Contract Disbursements

Rescission-in-Name-Only Does Not Moot a De Facto Federal Funding Freeze; APA Injunctions May Bar Categorical Freezes but Generally May Not Compel Grant/Contract Disbursements

Date: Mar 18, 2026
Rescission-in-Name-Only Does Not Moot a De Facto Federal Funding Freeze; APA Injunctions May Bar Categorical Freezes but Generally May Not Compel Grant/Contract Disbursements 1. Introduction In State...
Pro Se Extension Motions as Functional Notices of Appeal; Post-Muldrow “Worse Off” Standard Applied to ADEA Without Converting PIPs into Per Se Adverse Actions

Pro Se Extension Motions as Functional Notices of Appeal; Post-Muldrow “Worse Off” Standard Applied to ADEA Without Converting PIPs into Per Se Adverse Actions

Date: Mar 14, 2026
Pro Se Extension Motions as Functional Notices of Appeal; Post-Muldrow “Worse Off” Standard Applied to ADEA Without Converting PIPs into Per Se Adverse Actions Case: Walsh v. HNTB Corporation (No....
United States v. Parlin: Sufficiency Review Uses All Admitted Evidence; Harmless-Error Affirmance Without Deciding Lay vs. Expert Drug-Quantity Testimony

United States v. Parlin: Sufficiency Review Uses All Admitted Evidence; Harmless-Error Affirmance Without Deciding Lay vs. Expert Drug-Quantity Testimony

Date: Mar 14, 2026
United States v. Parlin: Sufficiency Review Uses All Admitted Evidence; Harmless-Error Affirmance Without Deciding Lay vs. Expert Drug-Quantity Testimony Introduction In United States v. Parlin (1st...
Maldonado-Ruiz v. Bondi: Unfulfilled, Unreported Threats and Subjective Belief Are Insufficient to Prove Nexus or Government Inability in LGBTI Asylum Claims

Maldonado-Ruiz v. Bondi: Unfulfilled, Unreported Threats and Subjective Belief Are Insufficient to Prove Nexus or Government Inability in LGBTI Asylum Claims

Date: Mar 12, 2026
Maldonado-Ruiz v. Bondi: Unfulfilled, Unreported Threats and Subjective Belief Are Insufficient to Prove Nexus or Government Inability in LGBTI Asylum Claims 1. Introduction In Maldonado-Ruiz v....
Scintilla Is Not Enough: Enforcing (or Defeating) Oral/Implied Contract Theories and § 1981 Bid-Exclusion Claims at Summary Judgment

Scintilla Is Not Enough: Enforcing (or Defeating) Oral/Implied Contract Theories and § 1981 Bid-Exclusion Claims at Summary Judgment

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Scintilla Is Not Enough: Enforcing (or Defeating) Oral/Implied Contract Theories and § 1981 Bid-Exclusion Claims at Summary Judgment I. Introduction John B. Cruz Construction Co., Inc. v. Beacon...
Post-Discharge “Related To” Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Does Not Automatically Terminate; Renewed Withdrawal Motions Must Be Timed to the Current Procedural Posture and Address Jury-Trial Requests

Post-Discharge “Related To” Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Does Not Automatically Terminate; Renewed Withdrawal Motions Must Be Timed to the Current Procedural Posture and Address Jury-Trial Requests

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Post-Discharge “Related To” Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Does Not Automatically Terminate; Renewed Withdrawal Motions Must Be Timed to the Current Procedural Posture and Address Jury-Trial Requests 1....
Administrative Closure Without Compelling Arbitration Is a Denial Appealable Under FAA § 16(a)(1)(B), and FAA § 4 Requires a Clear Order Directing Arbitration “In Accordance with the Terms” (Including Individual Arbitration)

Administrative Closure Without Compelling Arbitration Is a Denial Appealable Under FAA § 16(a)(1)(B), and FAA § 4 Requires a Clear Order Directing Arbitration “In Accordance with the Terms” (Including Individual Arbitration)

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Administrative Closure Without Compelling Arbitration Is a Denial Appealable Under FAA § 16(a)(1)(B), and FAA § 4 Requires a Clear Order Directing Arbitration “In Accordance with the Terms”...
United States v. Robles-López — Mitigating-Role Reductions Require a Full “Relevant Conduct” Comparator Universe and an On-the-Record Guía-Sendeme Analysis

United States v. Robles-López — Mitigating-Role Reductions Require a Full “Relevant Conduct” Comparator Universe and an On-the-Record Guía-Sendeme Analysis

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Mitigating-Role Reductions Require a Full “Relevant Conduct” Comparator Universe and an On-the-Record Guía-Sendeme Analysis 1. Introduction In United States v. Robles-López (1st Cir. Feb. 3, 2026),...
Boston v. OptumRx: Massachusetts Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling and “Continuing Nuisance” Require More Than Ongoing Harm and Publicly Available Clues Can Impute Actual Knowledge

Boston v. OptumRx: Massachusetts Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling and “Continuing Nuisance” Require More Than Ongoing Harm and Publicly Available Clues Can Impute Actual Knowledge

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Boston v. OptumRx: Massachusetts Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling and “Continuing Nuisance” Require More Than Ongoing Harm and Publicly Available Clues Can Impute Actual Knowledge 1. Introduction In...
Boston v. OptumRx: Public-Nuisance Claims Against PBMs Are Time-Barred When Public Information Makes Wrongdoing Probable and Discoverable (No “Continuing Nuisance” Without New Tortious Acts)

Boston v. OptumRx: Public-Nuisance Claims Against PBMs Are Time-Barred When Public Information Makes Wrongdoing Probable and Discoverable (No “Continuing Nuisance” Without New Tortious Acts)

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Boston v. OptumRx: Public-Nuisance Claims Against PBMs Are Time-Barred When Public Information Makes Wrongdoing Probable and Discoverable (No “Continuing Nuisance” Without New Tortious Acts)...
No “Substantial Asset” Threshold Under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(5): Any Unexplained Loss of Estate Assets Can Bar a Chapter 7 Discharge

No “Substantial Asset” Threshold Under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(5): Any Unexplained Loss of Estate Assets Can Bar a Chapter 7 Discharge

Date: Mar 3, 2026
No “Substantial Asset” Threshold Under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(5): Any Unexplained Loss of Estate Assets Can Bar a Chapter 7 Discharge Introduction Case: Coastal Capital, LLC v. Savage, No. 25-1249 (1st...
Da Silva-Queiroga v. Bondi: Isolated Domestic-Violence Harm, No Serious Injury, and Years Without Further Physical Harm Fail to Establish “Persecution” or a Well-Founded Fear

Da Silva-Queiroga v. Bondi: Isolated Domestic-Violence Harm, No Serious Injury, and Years Without Further Physical Harm Fail to Establish “Persecution” or a Well-Founded Fear

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Da Silva-Queiroga v. Bondi: Isolated Domestic-Violence Harm, No Serious Injury, and Years Without Further Physical Harm Fail to Establish “Persecution” or a Well-Founded Fear 1. Introduction In Da...
Supremacy Clause Limits Puerto Rico Act 66 Payment-Plan Stays of Federal Title VII Judgments

Supremacy Clause Limits Puerto Rico Act 66 Payment-Plan Stays of Federal Title VII Judgments

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Supremacy Clause Limits Puerto Rico Act 66 Payment-Plan Stays of Federal Title VII Judgments I. Introduction García Colon v. State Insurance Fund Corporation arises from a Title VII and Puerto Rico...
Supremacy Clause Preempts Puerto Rico Act 66/68 Payment-Plan Stays that Indefinitely Delay Execution of Federal Title VII Judgments

Supremacy Clause Preempts Puerto Rico Act 66/68 Payment-Plan Stays that Indefinitely Delay Execution of Federal Title VII Judgments

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Supremacy Clause Preempts Puerto Rico Act 66/68 Payment-Plan Stays that Indefinitely Delay Execution of Federal Title VII Judgments Introduction In Garcia Colon v. State Insurance Fund Corporation...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert