Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Riley Does Not Displace T.L.O.: Reasonable-Suspicion Cell-Phone Searches by School Officials Remain Permissible in the Fourth Circuit

Riley Does Not Displace T.L.O.: Reasonable-Suspicion Cell-Phone Searches by School Officials Remain Permissible in the Fourth Circuit

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Riley Does Not Displace T.L.O.: Reasonable-Suspicion Cell-Phone Searches by School Officials Remain Permissible in the Fourth Circuit I. Introduction In O.W. v. Marie L. Carr (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026),...
Rule 43 Sentencing Errors and the Rogers–Singletary Debate: Re-centering the Written Judgment as the Operative Sentence

Rule 43 Sentencing Errors and the Rogers–Singletary Debate: Re-centering the Written Judgment as the Operative Sentence

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Rule 43 Sentencing Errors and the Rogers–Singletary Debate: Re-centering the Written Judgment as the Operative Sentence Introduction United States v. John McLaurin comes to the Fourth Circuit in an...
Wolf Run Mining Co. v. DOWCP: In 15-Year Presumption Cases, Employers Must Affirmatively Exclude Coal-Dust Causation; ALJs May Use the 2000 Preamble to Test Medical Reasoning

Wolf Run Mining Co. v. DOWCP: In 15-Year Presumption Cases, Employers Must Affirmatively Exclude Coal-Dust Causation; ALJs May Use the 2000 Preamble to Test Medical Reasoning

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Wolf Run Mining Co. v. DOWCP: In 15-Year Presumption Cases, Employers Must Affirmatively Exclude Coal-Dust Causation; ALJs May Use the 2000 Preamble to Test Medical Reasoning Court: United States...
Undue Influence Can Void a Municipal Sewer-Backup Release When Emergency Need and Disparity Create a Jury Question (Fourth Circuit Applying North Carolina Law)

Undue Influence Can Void a Municipal Sewer-Backup Release When Emergency Need and Disparity Create a Jury Question (Fourth Circuit Applying North Carolina Law)

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Undue Influence Can Void a Municipal Sewer-Backup Release When Emergency Need and Disparity Create a Jury Question (Fourth Circuit Applying North Carolina Law) Case: Stephanie Walker v. City of...
Perry v. Marteney: Medical-Only School Vaccination Exemptions Remain “Generally Applicable”; Mahmoud/Yoder Parental-Rights Strict Scrutiny Does Not Displace Jacobson/Prince in Public-Health Mandates

Perry v. Marteney: Medical-Only School Vaccination Exemptions Remain “Generally Applicable”; Mahmoud/Yoder Parental-Rights Strict Scrutiny Does Not Displace Jacobson/Prince in Public-Health Mandates

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Perry v. Marteney: Medical-Only School Vaccination Exemptions Remain “Generally Applicable”; Mahmoud/Yoder Parental-Rights Strict Scrutiny Does Not Displace Jacobson/Prince in Public-Health Mandates...
Fourth Circuit: A Vacated Legal-Pornography Ban May Be Reimposed When New Individualized Evidence Emerges, and the Prior Mandate Is Not a Perpetual Bar

Fourth Circuit: A Vacated Legal-Pornography Ban May Be Reimposed When New Individualized Evidence Emerges, and the Prior Mandate Is Not a Perpetual Bar

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Fourth Circuit: A Vacated Legal-Pornography Ban May Be Reimposed When New Individualized Evidence Emerges, and the Prior Mandate Is Not a Perpetual Bar Case: United States v. Joseph Castellano (4th...
Fourth Circuit: NCAA Five-Year/JUCO Eligibility Rules Are Commercial Under the Sherman Act, but Mandatory Preliminary Injunctions Require Full Rule-of-Reason and a Proven Market

Fourth Circuit: NCAA Five-Year/JUCO Eligibility Rules Are Commercial Under the Sherman Act, but Mandatory Preliminary Injunctions Require Full Rule-of-Reason and a Proven Market

Date: Apr 6, 2026
Fourth Circuit: NCAA Five-Year/JUCO Eligibility Rules Are Commercial Under the Sherman Act, but Mandatory Preliminary Injunctions Require Full Rule-of-Reason and a Proven Market Introduction In...
Whistleblower IRA Claims: OSC Exhaustion Requires a Retaliation Theory and Supporting Facts; Agencies May Defeat Prima Facie Retaliation by Clear-and-Convincing “Same Action” Proof Under Carr

Whistleblower IRA Claims: OSC Exhaustion Requires a Retaliation Theory and Supporting Facts; Agencies May Defeat Prima Facie Retaliation by Clear-and-Convincing “Same Action” Proof Under Carr

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Whistleblower IRA Claims: OSC Exhaustion Requires a Retaliation Theory and Supporting Facts; Agencies May Defeat Prima Facie Retaliation by Clear-and-Convincing “Same Action” Proof Under Carr Case:...
Grave-Risk Findings and Discretionary Non-Return Under the Hague Convention Need Not Address Every Proposed Safeguard Explicitly

Grave-Risk Findings and Discretionary Non-Return Under the Hague Convention Need Not Address Every Proposed Safeguard Explicitly

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Grave-Risk Findings and Discretionary Non-Return Under the Hague Convention Need Not Address Every Proposed Safeguard Explicitly Introduction In Affachao Abdon Samey v. Grace Aguegue (4th Cir. Apr....
“All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Dismissal in a Settlement Precludes Later Federal Lanham Act Suits, and May Be Enforced via Rule 54(b) Reconsideration

“All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Dismissal in a Settlement Precludes Later Federal Lanham Act Suits, and May Be Enforced via Rule 54(b) Reconsideration

Date: Apr 4, 2026
“All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Dismissal in a Settlement Precludes Later Federal Lanham Act Suits, and May Be Enforced via Rule 54(b) Reconsideration I. Introduction Clear Touch Interactive,...
Settlement “Dismissal of All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Triggers Res Judicata to Bar Later Federal Lanham Act Claims

Settlement “Dismissal of All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Triggers Res Judicata to Bar Later Federal Lanham Act Claims

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Settlement “Dismissal of All Possible Claims and Counterclaims” Triggers Res Judicata to Bar Later Federal Lanham Act Claims Introduction Clear Touch Interactive, Inc. v. The Ockers Company (4th Cir....
States May Not Add Delivery/Data Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted 340B-Participant Statutes Are Likely Preempted

States May Not Add Delivery/Data Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted 340B-Participant Statutes Are Likely Preempted

Date: Apr 4, 2026
States May Not Add Delivery/Data Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted 340B-Participant Statutes Are Likely Preempted 1. Introduction In Pharmaceutical Research and...
States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted “Contract-Pharmacy Delivery” Mandates Are Likely Preempted

States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted “Contract-Pharmacy Delivery” Mandates Are Likely Preempted

Date: Apr 4, 2026
States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Spending-Power Bargain: Targeted “Contract-Pharmacy Delivery” Mandates Are Likely Preempted Case: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of...
Spending-Power Bargain Preemption: States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Manufacturer–Covered Entity Relationship

Spending-Power Bargain Preemption: States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Manufacturer–Covered Entity Relationship

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Spending-Power Bargain Preemption: States May Not Add Conditions to the Federal 340B Manufacturer–Covered Entity Relationship Case: Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. John McCuskey...
Title VII Vaccine-Mandate Pleading Rule: Minimal Notice of a Religious Conflict (Including Fetal-Cell Objections) Suffices Despite Mixed Secular Reasons

Title VII Vaccine-Mandate Pleading Rule: Minimal Notice of a Religious Conflict (Including Fetal-Cell Objections) Suffices Despite Mixed Secular Reasons

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Title VII Vaccine-Mandate Pleading Rule: Minimal Notice of a Religious Conflict (Including Fetal-Cell Objections) Suffices Despite Mixed Secular Reasons Case: Rod Jenkins v. Valley Health System (No....
United States v. Tostado — Standing to Appeal Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Material Oral/Written Discrepancies Require Resentencing

United States v. Tostado — Standing to Appeal Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Material Oral/Written Discrepancies Require Resentencing

Date: Apr 4, 2026
United States v. Tostado: Defendants Have Standing to Appeal Rogers–Singletary Errors, and Material Oral/Written Discrepancies in Search Conditions Require Full Resentencing 1. Introduction In United...
Limits of Liberal Construction in PLRA Screening: The “Essential Grievance” Rule for Pro Se Prisoner Pleadings

Limits of Liberal Construction in PLRA Screening: The “Essential Grievance” Rule for Pro Se Prisoner Pleadings

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Limits of Liberal Construction in PLRA Screening: The “Essential Grievance” Rule for Pro Se Prisoner Pleadings Introduction Daniel Jackson v. D. Dameron (4th Cir. Mar. 30, 2026) addresses how far a...
Unsettled State-Law Merits Defeat Fraudulent Joinder: “No Possibility” Requires Clear Foreclosure of the In-State Claim

Unsettled State-Law Merits Defeat Fraudulent Joinder: “No Possibility” Requires Clear Foreclosure of the In-State Claim

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Unsettled State-Law Merits Defeat Fraudulent Joinder: “No Possibility” Requires Clear Foreclosure of the In-State Claim Case: Jeremy Skidmore v. Michael Schinke Court: United States Court of Appeals...
Daugherty v. Dingus: Juror’s Personal Fear and Claimed Familiarity Are “Internal” Deliberative Influences Under AEDPA

Daugherty v. Dingus: Juror’s Personal Fear and Claimed Familiarity Are “Internal” Deliberative Influences Under AEDPA

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Daugherty v. Dingus: Juror’s Personal Fear and Claimed Familiarity Are “Internal” Deliberative Influences Under AEDPA Introduction In Tony Daugherty v. Dennis Dingus, Warden, the Fourth Circuit...
United States v. McMillan: Lay Investigative Testimony May Include Common-Sense Inferences; Uncorroborated Accomplice Testimony Can Sustain Conviction; New Rule 29 Grounds Are Forfeited Absent Manifest Miscarriage of Justice

United States v. McMillan: Lay Investigative Testimony May Include Common-Sense Inferences; Uncorroborated Accomplice Testimony Can Sustain Conviction; New Rule 29 Grounds Are Forfeited Absent Manifest Miscarriage of Justice

Date: Apr 3, 2026
United States v. McMillan: Lay Investigative Testimony May Include Common-Sense Inferences; Uncorroborated Accomplice Testimony Can Sustain Conviction; New Rule 29 Grounds Are Forfeited Absent...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert