Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Eligibility Is Not Entitlement: Discretionary Denial of Retroactive Amendment 821 Reductions Under § 3582(c)(2) Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Eligibility Is Not Entitlement: Discretionary Denial of Retroactive Amendment 821 Reductions Under § 3582(c)(2) Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Eligibility Is Not Entitlement: Discretionary Denial of Retroactive Amendment 821 Reductions Under § 3582(c)(2) Based on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction In United States v. Derek Dixon (11th Cir. Apr....
Upward Variance Affirmed Where Sentencing Court Grounds § 3553(a) Analysis in Defendant’s Defiance of Prior Federal Injunctions and Co-Defendant Disparity

Upward Variance Affirmed Where Sentencing Court Grounds § 3553(a) Analysis in Defendant’s Defiance of Prior Federal Injunctions and Co-Defendant Disparity

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Upward Variance Affirmed Where Sentencing Court Grounds § 3553(a) Analysis in Defendant’s Defiance of Prior Federal Injunctions and Co-Defendant Disparity I. Introduction In United States v. Jasen...
Implicit Eligibility Findings and § 5K2.6 Weapon Departures in Amendment 821 § 3582(c)(2) Proceedings (11th Cir.)

Implicit Eligibility Findings and § 5K2.6 Weapon Departures in Amendment 821 § 3582(c)(2) Proceedings (11th Cir.)

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Implicit Eligibility Findings and § 5K2.6 Weapon Departures in Amendment 821 § 3582(c)(2) Proceedings (11th Cir.) 1. Introduction In United States v. Donald M. Reynolds (11th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026) (per...
Compassionate Release May Be Denied on Dangerousness and § 3553(a) Alone, and Repeat Attacks on Prior Findings Are Precluded

Compassionate Release May Be Denied on Dangerousness and § 3553(a) Alone, and Repeat Attacks on Prior Findings Are Precluded

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Compassionate Release May Be Denied on Dangerousness and § 3553(a) Alone, and Repeat Attacks on Prior Findings Are Precluded I. Introduction In United States v. Harold Thornton (11th Cir. Apr. 28,...
IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline

IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline

Date: Apr 29, 2026
IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline 1. Introduction Kimberly Ballard v. Ameren Illinois Company...
Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation

Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation 1. Introduction In Harris v. Warden, FCI - Leavenworth (10th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026), federal...
Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording

Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording Case: United States v. Velazquez Hernandez (10th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026)...
Putnam v. EPR Properties: Unauthenticated Public Records Can Support a Prima Facie Showing of Personal Jurisdiction and Justify Jurisdictional Discovery; Jurisdictional Dismissals Should Be Without Prejudice

Putnam v. EPR Properties: Unauthenticated Public Records Can Support a Prima Facie Showing of Personal Jurisdiction and Justify Jurisdictional Discovery; Jurisdictional Dismissals Should Be Without Prejudice

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Putnam v. EPR Properties: Unauthenticated Public Records Can Support a Prima Facie Showing of Personal Jurisdiction and Justify Jurisdictional Discovery; Jurisdictional Dismissals Should Be Without...
Rule 60(b)(4) Voidness Is Limited to Jurisdictional or Due-Process Defects; “Non-Party” Filings and Attorney Conflicts (If Unraised) Do Not Void the Judgment

Rule 60(b)(4) Voidness Is Limited to Jurisdictional or Due-Process Defects; “Non-Party” Filings and Attorney Conflicts (If Unraised) Do Not Void the Judgment

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Rule 60(b)(4) Voidness Is Limited to Jurisdictional or Due-Process Defects; “Non-Party” Filings and Attorney Conflicts (If Unraised) Do Not Void the Judgment 1. Introduction In Stacy Terry v. Matthew...
United States v. Joshua Martinez: No Bruton Violation for Indirectly Inculpatory Codefendant Statements, and Failure to Object Triggers Plain-Error Review

United States v. Joshua Martinez: No Bruton Violation for Indirectly Inculpatory Codefendant Statements, and Failure to Object Triggers Plain-Error Review

Date: Apr 29, 2026
No Bruton Violation for Indirectly Inculpatory Codefendant Statements, and Failure to Object Triggers Plain-Error Review (11th Cir.) Case: United States v. Joshua Martinez (with Florence Louise Beck...
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: “High Seas” Includes EEZs; Statelessness by Silence; Joint Interdiction with Foreign Allies Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction

MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: “High Seas” Includes EEZs; Statelessness by Silence; Joint Interdiction with Foreign Allies Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 29, 2026
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: “High Seas” Includes EEZs; Statelessness by Silence; Joint Interdiction with Foreign Allies Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction I. Introduction This consolidated Eleventh...
EEZ as “High Seas” and Silence as Statelessness Under the MDLEA

EEZ as “High Seas” and Silence as Statelessness Under the MDLEA

Date: Apr 29, 2026
EEZ as “High Seas” and Silence as Statelessness Under the MDLEA I. Introduction In United States v. Tony Rafael Henriquez (consolidated with appeals by Jose Antonio Acosta-Pinedo and Julio Javier...
Contemporaneous-Objection Preservation of Bruton Claims and the “Facially Incriminating” Limit: United States v. Beck

Contemporaneous-Objection Preservation of Bruton Claims and the “Facially Incriminating” Limit: United States v. Beck

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Contemporaneous-Objection Preservation of Bruton Claims and the “Facially Incriminating” Limit 1. Introduction United States v. Philip Beck (11th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026) is an unpublished per curiam...
Upward “Variance,” Not Guidelines “Departure”: No U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 Findings Required When the District Court Moves Above the Plea-Range Based on § 3553(a)

Upward “Variance,” Not Guidelines “Departure”: No U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 Findings Required When the District Court Moves Above the Plea-Range Based on § 3553(a)

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Upward “Variance,” Not Guidelines “Departure”: No U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 Findings Required When the District Court Moves Above the Plea-Range Based on § 3553(a) 1. Introduction In United States v. Ernest...
Clear-Error Deference Governs § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Determinations Even on Undisputed Facts

Clear-Error Deference Governs § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Determinations Even on Undisputed Facts

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Clear-Error Deference Governs § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Determinations Even on Undisputed Facts United States v. Jaylen Simpson (6th Cir. Apr. 27, 2026) Appeal from the Western District of...
Rule 4(m) Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Create a “Prevailing Party” for Fla. Stat. § 57.105(7) Fee Reciprocity

Rule 4(m) Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Create a “Prevailing Party” for Fla. Stat. § 57.105(7) Fee Reciprocity

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Rule 4(m) Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Create a “Prevailing Party” for Fla. Stat. § 57.105(7) Fee Reciprocity Case: U.S. Bank National Association v. Fernando V. Rivabem (11th Cir. Apr. 27,...
Proximity-and-Extensive-Use Rule on Plain-Error Review for U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and § 2D1.1(b)(12) Enhancements

Proximity-and-Extensive-Use Rule on Plain-Error Review for U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and § 2D1.1(b)(12) Enhancements

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Proximity-and-Extensive-Use Rule on Plain-Error Review for U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and § 2D1.1(b)(12) Enhancements 1. Introduction In United States v. David Kennedy (11th Cir. Apr. 27, 2026)...
MDLEA Jurisdiction Reaffirmed: Foreign EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Silence on Nationality Creates Statelessness, and Allied Interdiction Does Not Defeat U.S. Prosecution

MDLEA Jurisdiction Reaffirmed: Foreign EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Silence on Nationality Creates Statelessness, and Allied Interdiction Does Not Defeat U.S. Prosecution

Date: Apr 29, 2026
MDLEA Jurisdiction Reaffirmed: Foreign EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Silence on Nationality Creates Statelessness, and Allied Interdiction Does Not Defeat U.S. Prosecution Introduction In United States...
Upward Variances for Threats Against Federal Judges May Rest on Seriousness and Deterrence Even When Guideline Enhancements Apply

Upward Variances for Threats Against Federal Judges May Rest on Seriousness and Deterrence Even When Guideline Enhancements Apply

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Upward Variances for Threats Against Federal Judges May Rest on Seriousness and Deterrence Even When Guideline Enhancements Apply Case: United States v. Stephen Thorn (11th Cir. Apr. 27, 2026) (per...
Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666

Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666 I. Introduction United States v. Michael...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert