Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

Proposed § 3-1-804, MCA: Random, Documented, Proximity-Based Selection of Substitute District Judges (Notice-and-Comment Order)

Proposed § 3-1-804, MCA: Random, Documented, Proximity-Based Selection of Substitute District Judges (Notice-and-Comment Order)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Proposed § 3-1-804, MCA: Random, Documented, Proximity-Based Selection of Substitute District Judges (Notice-and-Comment Order) 1. Introduction In re Revised Rules on Substitution of District Judges...
Kalarchik v. State: Article II, Section 4 Treats Transgender Status Discrimination as Sex Discrimination in Identity-Document Amendments (Strict Scrutiny at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage)

Kalarchik v. State: Article II, Section 4 Treats Transgender Status Discrimination as Sex Discrimination in Identity-Document Amendments (Strict Scrutiny at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage)

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Kalarchik v. State: Article II, Section 4 Treats Transgender Status Discrimination as Sex Discrimination in Identity-Document Amendments (Strict Scrutiny at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage) Court:...
State v. Trombley: Ability-to-Pay Harmonization Validates Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines (If Suspendable), and Probation Cannot Reinstate Suspended Monetary Sanctions

State v. Trombley: Ability-to-Pay Harmonization Validates Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines (If Suspendable), and Probation Cannot Reinstate Suspended Monetary Sanctions

Date: Apr 17, 2026
State v. Trombley: Ability-to-Pay Harmonization Validates Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines (If Suspendable), and Probation Cannot Reinstate Suspended Monetary Sanctions 1. Introduction In State v....
Torgison v. Lincoln County: Preliminary Injunctions in Open-Meeting Cases Must Preserve the Status Quo and Cannot Be Used to Unwind Completed Property Contracts

Torgison v. Lincoln County: Preliminary Injunctions in Open-Meeting Cases Must Preserve the Status Quo and Cannot Be Used to Unwind Completed Property Contracts

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Torgison v. Lincoln County: Preliminary Injunctions in Open-Meeting Cases Must Preserve the Status Quo and Cannot Be Used to Unwind Completed Property Contracts 1. Introduction Parties. Daniel W....
Dolan v. Guenther (2026 MT 73) — COSA “Abandon Ditches” Conditions Defeat Implied Easements by Existing Use Absent Reasonable Contemplation at Severance

Dolan v. Guenther (2026 MT 73) — COSA “Abandon Ditches” Conditions Defeat Implied Easements by Existing Use Absent Reasonable Contemplation at Severance

Date: Apr 9, 2026
COSA “Abandon Ditches” Conditions and Constructive Notice Can Negate the Intent Element for an Implied Easement by Existing Use Dolan v. Guenther, 2026 MT 73 (Mont. Apr. 7, 2026) — Supreme Court of...
Restitution as an Evidentiary Sentencing Issue: Uncontroverted Victim Testimony, Reasonably Certain Deductibles, and Preservation Limits

Restitution as an Evidentiary Sentencing Issue: Uncontroverted Victim Testimony, Reasonably Certain Deductibles, and Preservation Limits

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Restitution as an Evidentiary Sentencing Issue: Uncontroverted Victim Testimony, Reasonably Certain Deductibles, and Preservation Limits Introduction In City of Helena v. Ittner (Mont. Sup. Ct. 2026...
Equal Protection Requires Parity Between Abortion-Clinic and Miscarriage-Care Regulation When Procedures Are Identical

Equal Protection Requires Parity Between Abortion-Clinic and Miscarriage-Care Regulation When Procedures Are Identical

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Equal Protection Requires Parity Between Abortion-Clinic and Miscarriage-Care Regulation When Procedures Are Identical 1. Introduction All Families Healthcare; Blue Mountain Clinic; and Helen Weems,...
Mandatory Minimum Fines and Ability-to-Pay: Courts Must Impose the Statutory Minimum but Suspend It to the Extent of Inability

Mandatory Minimum Fines and Ability-to-Pay: Courts Must Impose the Statutory Minimum but Suspend It to the Extent of Inability

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Mandatory Minimum Fines and Ability-to-Pay: Courts Must Impose the Statutory Minimum but Suspend It to the Extent of Inability 1. Introduction City of Whitefish v. T. Curran (Mont. 2026 MT 65)...
D’Hooge v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (2026 MT 63): Pre-2023 § 33-18-242, MCA, Does Not Limit Third-Party Claimants to Bad-Faith Theories

D’Hooge v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (2026 MT 63): Pre-2023 § 33-18-242, MCA, Does Not Limit Third-Party Claimants to Bad-Faith Theories

Date: Apr 4, 2026
D’Hooge v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (2026 MT 63): Pre-2023 § 33-18-242, MCA, Does Not Limit Third-Party Claimants to Bad-Faith Theories Introduction In D’Hooge v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, the Montana...
Probate Courts May Restrain a Personal Representative Under § 72-3-617, MCA, Without Converting Informal Probate or Applying Title 27 Injunction/Bond Requirements

Probate Courts May Restrain a Personal Representative Under § 72-3-617, MCA, Without Converting Informal Probate or Applying Title 27 Injunction/Bond Requirements

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Probate Courts May Restrain a Personal Representative Under § 72-3-617, MCA, Without Converting Informal Probate or Applying Title 27 Injunction/Bond Requirements Introduction Estate of Sean Edward...
Supervised Parenting Time in Montana Dissolutions: No “Actual Harm” Finding Required Under § 40-4-219, and “De Facto” Emotional-Impairment Findings Suffice Under § 40-4-218(2)

Supervised Parenting Time in Montana Dissolutions: No “Actual Harm” Finding Required Under § 40-4-219, and “De Facto” Emotional-Impairment Findings Suffice Under § 40-4-218(2)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Supervised Parenting Time in Montana Dissolutions: No “Actual Harm” Finding Required Under § 40-4-219, and “De Facto” Emotional-Impairment Findings Suffice Under § 40-4-218(2) Introduction In re the...
Lowry v. State Electrical Board: Interpreter-Request Error Warrants Relief Only on Preserved Claims and a Showing of Substantial Prejudice Under MAPA

Lowry v. State Electrical Board: Interpreter-Request Error Warrants Relief Only on Preserved Claims and a Showing of Substantial Prejudice Under MAPA

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Lowry v. State Electrical Board: Interpreter-Request Error Warrants Relief Only on Preserved Claims and a Showing of Substantial Prejudice Under MAPA Introduction In Lowry v. State, 2026 MT 71N...
Sham “Transfer” of Inherited Real Property May Be Treated as Marital for Equitable Apportionment; Maintenance Denied Absent Proof of Statutory Need

Sham “Transfer” of Inherited Real Property May Be Treated as Marital for Equitable Apportionment; Maintenance Denied Absent Proof of Statutory Need

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Sham “Transfer” of Inherited Real Property May Be Treated as Marital for Equitable Apportionment; Maintenance Denied Absent Proof of Statutory Need 1. Introduction Marriage of Barrett (2026 MT 70N)...
Reaffirming Trial-Court Discretion: Orders of Protection, Courtroom Control, and Best-Interest Parenting Plans Under § 40-4-212, MCA

Reaffirming Trial-Court Discretion: Orders of Protection, Courtroom Control, and Best-Interest Parenting Plans Under § 40-4-212, MCA

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Reaffirming Trial-Court Discretion: Orders of Protection, Courtroom Control, and Best-Interest Parenting Plans Under § 40-4-212, MCA Introduction In re the Marriage of Snelson and Baez, 2026 MT 69N...
Matter of T.J.M.: Detention-Center Clinician May Serve as “Friend of Respondent” Absent Showing of Conflict; Technical Timing of Appointment Will Not Defeat Waiver

Matter of T.J.M.: Detention-Center Clinician May Serve as “Friend of Respondent” Absent Showing of Conflict; Technical Timing of Appointment Will Not Defeat Waiver

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Matter of T.J.M.: Detention-Center Clinician May Serve as “Friend of Respondent” Absent Showing of Conflict; Technical Timing of Appointment Will Not Defeat Waiver Introduction Matter of T.J.M....
Executed Oral Modification of Parenting-Plan Child Support Can Bar Arrears After a Long-Term Custody Shift (Marriage of Nevin, 2026 MT 62N)

Executed Oral Modification of Parenting-Plan Child Support Can Bar Arrears After a Long-Term Custody Shift (Marriage of Nevin, 2026 MT 62N)

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Executed Oral Modification of Parenting-Plan Child Support Can Bar Arrears After a Long-Term Custody Shift (In re the Marriage of Nevin, 2026 MT 62N) Nonprecedential status: The Court issued a...
State v. Pratt (2026 MT 58): Charging-Statute Controls—No Retroactive Prosecution Under Post‑2007 SVORA for Pre‑2007 Convictions

State v. Pratt (2026 MT 58): Charging-Statute Controls—No Retroactive Prosecution Under Post‑2007 SVORA for Pre‑2007 Convictions

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Charging-Statute Controls: Montana Bars Retroactive Prosecution Under Post‑2007 SVORA When the Information Pleads Only the Current Act 1. Introduction In State v. Pratt, 2026 MT 58, the Montana...
Revocation Limits in Montana: Courts May Revoke Only Suspended/Deferred Time—Not the Probationary Remainder of a Custodial Sentence

Revocation Limits in Montana: Courts May Revoke Only Suspended/Deferred Time—Not the Probationary Remainder of a Custodial Sentence

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Revocation Limits in Montana: Courts May Revoke Only Suspended/Deferred Time—Not the Probationary Remainder of a Custodial Sentence Case: State v. Sanchez, 2026 MT 61 (Mont. Mar. 24, 2026) | Court:...
Roaring Lion Ranch v. YC Properties: Limits on Rule 12(d) Conversion When a Court References the Underlying Proceeding

Roaring Lion Ranch v. YC Properties: Limits on Rule 12(d) Conversion When a Court References the Underlying Proceeding

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Roaring Lion Ranch v. YC Properties: Rule 12(d) Conversion Is Unnecessary (and Prejudicial) When the Court Only References the Underlying Proceeding Supreme Court of Montana — 2026 MT 60 (DA 25-0331)...
State v. Trombley: “Lawful Excuse” in Montana Bail Jumping Functions as an Affirmative Defense; the State Need Not Plead Its Absence

State v. Trombley: “Lawful Excuse” in Montana Bail Jumping Functions as an Affirmative Defense; the State Need Not Plead Its Absence

Date: Mar 26, 2026
State v. Trombley: “Lawful Excuse” in Montana Bail Jumping Functions as an Affirmative Defense; the State Need Not Plead Its Absence 1. Introduction In State v. Trombley, 2026 MT 59, the Montana...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert