Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

Pierce v. Salmonsen (Mont. 2026): Prefiling Leave Requirement for Repetitive Postconviction Filings and Territorial Habeas Jurisdiction

Pierce v. Salmonsen (Mont. 2026): Prefiling Leave Requirement for Repetitive Postconviction Filings and Territorial Habeas Jurisdiction

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Pierce v. Salmonsen (Mont. 2026): Prefiling Leave Requirement for Repetitive Postconviction Filings and Territorial Habeas Jurisdiction Introduction In Pierce v. Salmonsen (caption amended by the...
State v. Emmings: Coordinate-Jurisdiction Law-of-the-Case Limits Reconsideration; Out-of-State Residency on Conditional Discharge Does Not Terminate a Sentence

State v. Emmings: Coordinate-Jurisdiction Law-of-the-Case Limits Reconsideration; Out-of-State Residency on Conditional Discharge Does Not Terminate a Sentence

Date: Mar 20, 2026
State v. Emmings: Coordinate-Jurisdiction Law-of-the-Case Limits Reconsideration; Out-of-State Residency on Conditional Discharge Does Not Terminate a Sentence Case: State v. A. Emmings, 2026 MT 54...
Front-End Participation Satisfies Article II, Section 8: MLUPA Site-Specific Limits Survive Facial Challenge (and Covenant Declaration Vacated as Advisory)

Front-End Participation Satisfies Article II, Section 8: MLUPA Site-Specific Limits Survive Facial Challenge (and Covenant Declaration Vacated as Advisory)

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Front-End Participation Satisfies Article II, Section 8: MLUPA Site-Specific Limits Survive Facial Challenge (and Covenant Declaration Vacated as Advisory) Introduction M.A.I.D. v. State (2026 MT 53)...
State v. Flores-Reyes: Third-Party Vehicle Consent Does Not Extend to Sealed Containers Hidden From View Absent Common Authority

State v. Flores-Reyes: Third-Party Vehicle Consent Does Not Extend to Sealed Containers Hidden From View Absent Common Authority

Date: Mar 20, 2026
State v. Flores-Reyes: Third-Party Vehicle Consent Does Not Extend to Sealed Containers Hidden From View Absent Common Authority 1. Introduction In State v. Flores-Reyes (2026 MT 56), the Montana...
State v. Larson (2026 MT 55): Speedy-Trial Delay Is Counted Only When an Act Postpones the Trial/Disposition Date; Plea Negotiations Are Not a Waiver and the Clock Ends at the Plea

State v. Larson (2026 MT 55): Speedy-Trial Delay Is Counted Only When an Act Postpones the Trial/Disposition Date; Plea Negotiations Are Not a Waiver and the Clock Ends at the Plea

Date: Mar 20, 2026
State v. Larson (2026 MT 55): Speedy-Trial Delay Is Counted Only When an Act Postpones the Trial/Disposition Date; Plea Negotiations Are Not a Waiver and the Clock Ends at the Plea Court: Supreme...
Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines Are Constitutional When Courts Suspend the Unpayable Portion After a Required Ability-to-Pay Inquiry (Overruling State v. Gibbons)

Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines Are Constitutional When Courts Suspend the Unpayable Portion After a Required Ability-to-Pay Inquiry (Overruling State v. Gibbons)

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Mandatory DUI Minimum Fines Are Constitutional When Courts Suspend the Unpayable Portion After a Required Ability-to-Pay Inquiry (Overruling State v. Gibbons) Case: State v. N. Cole, 2026 MT 52...
Street-Time Credit on Revocation: Continuous-Violation Findings May Be Period-Based, Not a Daily Accounting

Street-Time Credit on Revocation: Continuous-Violation Findings May Be Period-Based, Not a Daily Accounting

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Street-Time Credit on Revocation: Continuous-Violation Findings May Be Period-Based, Not a Daily Accounting Case: State v. Valenzuela, 2026 MT 57N (Mont. Mar. 17, 2026) (memorandum opinion,...
State v. Walton: Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Evidentiary Claims, Non-Mandatory 404(b) Limiting Instructions, and Permissible “Blind Expert” Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

State v. Walton: Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Evidentiary Claims, Non-Mandatory 404(b) Limiting Instructions, and Permissible “Blind Expert” Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

Date: Mar 13, 2026
State v. Walton: Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Evidentiary Claims, Non-Mandatory 404(b) Limiting Instructions, and Permissible “Blind Expert” Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials Introduction...
Record Silence Sends Ineffective-Assistance and Right-to-Testify Claims to Postconviction Review (State v. Roope)

Record Silence Sends Ineffective-Assistance and Right-to-Testify Claims to Postconviction Review (State v. Roope)

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Record Silence Sends Ineffective-Assistance and Right-to-Testify Claims to Postconviction Review (State v. Roope) 1. Introduction In State v. Roope, 2026 MT 51N (Mont. Mar. 10, 2026) (memorandum...
Buck v. Conrad: Oral Pronouncement Controls; No Double-Counting of Jail Credit on Revocation

Buck v. Conrad: Oral Pronouncement Controls; No Double-Counting of Jail Credit on Revocation

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Buck v. Conrad: Oral Pronouncement Controls; No Double-Counting of Jail Credit on Revocation 1. Introduction In Buck v. Conrad (Mont. Mar. 10, 2026), petitioner Michael A. Buck sought habeas corpus...
Flat-Fee Retainers and Counsel Withdrawal: No Cronic Presumption When Withdrawal Is Granted and New Counsel Appointed

Flat-Fee Retainers and Counsel Withdrawal: No Cronic Presumption When Withdrawal Is Granted and New Counsel Appointed

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Flat-Fee Retainers and Counsel Withdrawal: No Cronic Presumption When Withdrawal Is Granted and New Counsel Appointed Case: K. Briggs v. State (2026 MT 47) | Court: Supreme Court of Montana | Date:...
Parenting-Plan Modification Requires Admissible Proof of Changed Circumstances; Judge’s Remote (Zoom) Appearance Is Not Structural/Plain Error Absent Prejudice

Parenting-Plan Modification Requires Admissible Proof of Changed Circumstances; Judge’s Remote (Zoom) Appearance Is Not Structural/Plain Error Absent Prejudice

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Parenting-Plan Modification Requires Admissible Proof of Changed Circumstances; Judge’s Remote (Zoom) Appearance Is Not Structural/Plain Error Absent Prejudice Introduction Case: In re the Marriage...
Guilty Pleas to Some Counts in a Single Information Do Not Trigger § 46-11-503(1)(b) Double-Jeopardy Bar Absent a Judgment or Sentence

Guilty Pleas to Some Counts in a Single Information Do Not Trigger § 46-11-503(1)(b) Double-Jeopardy Bar Absent a Judgment or Sentence

Date: Mar 12, 2026
Guilty Pleas to Some Counts in a Single Information Do Not Trigger § 46-11-503(1)(b) Double-Jeopardy Bar Absent a Judgment or Sentence 1. Introduction State v. Standifur (2026 MT 49) addresses the...
Plain Error Must Be Requested in the Opening Brief; Napue Relief Requires Proof of Actual Falsity (State v. Stinger, 2026 MT 46)

Plain Error Must Be Requested in the Opening Brief; Napue Relief Requires Proof of Actual Falsity (State v. Stinger, 2026 MT 46)

Date: Mar 12, 2026
Plain Error Must Be Requested in the Opening Brief; Napue Relief Requires Proof of Actual Falsity 1. Introduction In State v. J. Stinger, the Supreme Court of Montana affirmed Justin Casey Stinger’s...
State v. Sandberg (2026 MT 45): “Victim” Labeling in Disputed-Crime Trials and the Limits of Consciousness-of-Guilt Evidence

State v. Sandberg (2026 MT 45): “Victim” Labeling in Disputed-Crime Trials and the Limits of Consciousness-of-Guilt Evidence

Date: Mar 12, 2026
State v. Sandberg (2026 MT 45): “Victim” Labeling in Disputed-Crime Trials and the Limits of Consciousness-of-Guilt Evidence 1. Introduction In State v. K. Sandberg, the Supreme Court of Montana...
State v. Haacke (2026 MT 40): No Per Se For-Cause Strike for a Juror’s “Preference” That the Defense Rebut the State—Bias Assessed by Totality of Statements and Voir Dire Context

State v. Haacke (2026 MT 40): No Per Se For-Cause Strike for a Juror’s “Preference” That the Defense Rebut the State—Bias Assessed by Totality of Statements and Voir Dire Context

Date: Mar 7, 2026
No Per Se For-Cause Strike for a Juror’s “Preference” That the Defense Rebut the State—Impartiality Turns on the Totality of Statements and Voir Dire Context Case: State v. R. Haacke, 2026 MT 40...
Centron v. Hollewijn: Summary Judgment Must Track the Motion; “Reasonable Time” to Object in Account-Stated Claims Is Generally for the Jury

Centron v. Hollewijn: Summary Judgment Must Track the Motion; “Reasonable Time” to Object in Account-Stated Claims Is Generally for the Jury

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Centron v. Hollewijn: Summary Judgment Must Track the Motion; “Reasonable Time” to Object in Account-Stated Claims Is Generally for the Jury 1. Introduction In Centron Services, Inc. d/b/a Rocky...
Permanent Protection Orders May Bar Parent-Child Contact Until Age 18 When Necessary to Prevent Harm

Permanent Protection Orders May Bar Parent-Child Contact Until Age 18 When Necessary to Prevent Harm

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Permanent Protection Orders May Bar Parent-Child Contact Until Age 18 When Necessary to Prevent Harm I. Introduction Darrah v. Haggag (Mont. 2026 MT 43N) concerns whether the Seventeenth Judicial...
State v. Hinkle (2026 MT 42): No Hearing Required on a Motion to Discharge a Jury Panel Absent Facts Showing Substantial Noncompliance Affecting Randomness/Objectivity

State v. Hinkle (2026 MT 42): No Hearing Required on a Motion to Discharge a Jury Panel Absent Facts Showing Substantial Noncompliance Affecting Randomness/Objectivity

Date: Mar 6, 2026
State v. Hinkle (2026 MT 42): No Hearing Required on a Motion to Discharge a Jury Panel Absent Facts Showing Substantial Noncompliance Affecting Randomness/Objectivity Court: Supreme Court of Montana...
Closely Related “Initiative-and-Referendum Right” Amendments Satisfy Montana’s Separate-Vote Rule; Fiscal Statements Require a Determinable Fiscal Impact

Closely Related “Initiative-and-Referendum Right” Amendments Satisfy Montana’s Separate-Vote Rule; Fiscal Statements Require a Determinable Fiscal Impact

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Closely Related “Initiative-and-Referendum Right” Amendments Satisfy Montana’s Separate-Vote Rule; Fiscal Statements Require a Determinable Fiscal Impact Introduction In T. Kendrick v. A. Knudsen...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert