Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Connecticut Case Commentaries

Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform Note: This...
Connecticut Adopts a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the State Due Process Clauses: Commentary on State v. McFarland (2025)

Connecticut Adopts a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the State Due Process Clauses: Commentary on State v. McFarland (2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Connecticut Adopts a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the State Due Process Clauses: Commentary on State v. McFarland (2025) Introduction State v. McFarland is a landmark decision of the...
State v. McFarland: Connecticut Adopts a State Due Process Balancing Test for Pre‑Accusation Delay—Concurrence Urges Retaining Marion–Lovasco

State v. McFarland: Connecticut Adopts a State Due Process Balancing Test for Pre‑Accusation Delay—Concurrence Urges Retaining Marion–Lovasco

Date: Sep 4, 2025
State v. McFarland: Connecticut Adopts a State Due Process Balancing Test for Pre‑Accusation Delay—Concurrence Urges Retaining Marion–Lovasco Introduction In State v. McFarland (Conn. Sept. 2, 2025),...
Balancing, Not Bad Faith: Connecticut Adopts a Barker-Style Test for Prearrest Delay Due Process Claims

Balancing, Not Bad Faith: Connecticut Adopts a Barker-Style Test for Prearrest Delay Due Process Claims

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Balancing, Not Bad Faith: Connecticut Adopts a Barker-Style Test for Prearrest Delay Due Process Claims Introduction In State v. McFarland (Second Concurrence), Supreme Court of Connecticut (Sept. 2,...
Toward a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the Connecticut Constitution: Justice Alexander’s Concurrence in State v. McFarland

Toward a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the Connecticut Constitution: Justice Alexander’s Concurrence in State v. McFarland

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Toward a Balancing Test for Prearrest Delay Under the Connecticut Constitution: Justice Alexander’s Concurrence in State v. McFarland Introduction In State v. McFarland (Supreme Court of Connecticut,...
State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. Jacques: Probable Cause Survives Appellate Suppression; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Bar Confrontation or Whelan; Reliability Threshold for Jailhouse Informants Affirmed Introduction In...
No Ineffective-Assistance Exception: Clue v. Commissioner of Correction and the Finality of Habeas Judgments under § 52-212a

No Ineffective-Assistance Exception: Clue v. Commissioner of Correction and the Finality of Habeas Judgments under § 52-212a

Date: Aug 26, 2025
No Ineffective-Assistance Exception: Supreme Court of Connecticut Bars Late Opening of Habeas Judgments under § 52-212a 1. Introduction In Clue v. Commissioner of Correction, 348 Conn. ___ (2025),...
Distinct Constitutional Treatment of Insanity Acquittees Confirmed: Commentary on State v. Foster (Conn. 2025)

Distinct Constitutional Treatment of Insanity Acquittees Confirmed: Commentary on State v. Foster (Conn. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“A Special Class that Should Be Treated Differently”: The Connecticut Supreme Court Re-aligns Equal-Protection Doctrine for Insanity Acquittees – State v. Foster, 353 Conn. 1 (2025) 1. Introduction...
Clarifying “Imminent Dangerousness”: State v. Foster Sets a Strict Evidentiary Compass for the Continued Commitment of Insanity Acquittees

Clarifying “Imminent Dangerousness”: State v. Foster Sets a Strict Evidentiary Compass for the Continued Commitment of Insanity Acquittees

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Clarifying “Imminent Dangerousness”: State v. Foster Sets a Strict Evidentiary Compass for the Continued Commitment of Insanity Acquittees 1. Introduction State v. Foster, --- Conn. --- (Aug. 19,...
Vacatur of Moot Commitment Orders for Insanity Acquittees: State v. Guild (Conn. 2025)

Vacatur of Moot Commitment Orders for Insanity Acquittees: State v. Guild (Conn. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Vacatur of Moot Commitment Orders for Insanity Acquittees: State v. Guild, 353 Conn. ____ (2025) Introduction State v. Guild confronts the Connecticut Supreme Court with an increasingly common...
State v. Evans (2025): Clarifying “More-Than-Minimal Familiarity” for Lay Identifications and Defining Reasonable Temporal Limits on CSLI Warrants

State v. Evans (2025): Clarifying “More-Than-Minimal Familiarity” for Lay Identifications and Defining Reasonable Temporal Limits on CSLI Warrants

Date: Aug 18, 2025
State v. Evans (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025): Clarifying “More-Than-Minimal Familiarity” for Lay Identifications and Defining Reasonable Temporal Limits on CSLI Warrants Introduction In State...
“From Familiar Faces to Fleeting Glimpses” — State v. Evans (2025) and the New, Broadened Standard for Lay-Witness Identifications from Surveillance Images

“From Familiar Faces to Fleeting Glimpses” — State v. Evans (2025) and the New, Broadened Standard for Lay-Witness Identifications from Surveillance Images

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“From Familiar Faces to Fleeting Glimpses”: State v. Evans (Conn. 2025) Expands the Admissibility of Lay-Witness Identifications from Surveillance Media 1. Introduction State v. Evans is a murder...
State v. Myers (2025):  Re-Drawing the Line Between Evidentiary and Constitutional Error in Third-Party Culpability Cases

State v. Myers (2025): Re-Drawing the Line Between Evidentiary and Constitutional Error in Third-Party Culpability Cases

Date: Aug 18, 2025
State v. Myers (Conn. 2025): Clarifying When the Exclusion of Third-Party Culpability Evidence is Merely Evidentiary, Not Constitutional Introduction State v. Myers, officially released on 12 August...
Jamie G. v. DCF: Sovereign Immunity Waiver Does Not Abrogate Quasi-Judicial Immunity under Connecticut General Statutes § 4-160

Jamie G. v. DCF: Sovereign Immunity Waiver Does Not Abrogate Quasi-Judicial Immunity under Connecticut General Statutes § 4-160

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Jamie G. v. Department of Children & Families (Conn. 2025): Preserving Quasi-Judicial Immunity Despite a Sovereign Immunity Waiver under § 4-160 Introduction On 5 August 2025 the Connecticut Supreme...
White v. FCW Law Offices: Harmonising Treble Damages and CUTPA Punitive Damages

White v. FCW Law Offices: Harmonising Treble Damages and CUTPA Punitive Damages

Date: Aug 6, 2025
White v. FCW Law Offices (2025): Harmonising Treble Damages for Identity Theft with Punitive Damages under CUTPA 1. Introduction In White v. FCW Law Offices, the Supreme Court of Connecticut...
High Watch Recovery Center Rule: Competitors Lack Standing to Appeal Connecticut Certificate-of-Need Approvals

High Watch Recovery Center Rule: Competitors Lack Standing to Appeal Connecticut Certificate-of-Need Approvals

Date: Aug 6, 2025
High Watch Recovery Center Rule: Competitors Lack Standing to Appeal Connecticut Certificate-of-Need Approvals Introduction On 5 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Connecticut delivered its opinion in...
Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3)

Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3) Introduction On 29 July 2025 the Connecticut Supreme Court delivered its...
State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses

State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses

Date: Jul 31, 2025
State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses Introduction In State v. Parris, the Connecticut Supreme Court addressed whether repeated...
State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

Date: Jul 31, 2025
State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance Introduction State v. Parris (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025) is a landmark decision that...
“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: A Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall (Conn. 2025)

“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: A Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall (Conn. 2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall, Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025 1. Introduction Parties & Setting....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert