Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

No Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 103.03(b) for Trust Code Orders Restoring Property or Removing a Trustee

No Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 103.03(b) for Trust Code Orders Restoring Property or Removing a Trustee

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 103.03(b) for Trust Code Orders Restoring Property or Removing a Trustee Introduction In this precedential decision, the Minnesota Supreme Court clarifies a...
“Received” Means Where Any Recipient Takes Possession: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Service-Receipt Sourcing Is Not Limited to Direct Customers

“Received” Means Where Any Recipient Takes Possession: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Service-Receipt Sourcing Is Not Limited to Direct Customers

Date: Sep 25, 2025
“Received” Means Where Any Recipient Takes Possession: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Service-Receipt Sourcing Is Not Limited to Direct Customers Introduction In Humana MarketPoint, Inc., Relator...
Waiver-by-Acceptance Applies Equally to Publicly Subsidized and Private Tenancies; “Acceptance” Is a Fact Question Assessed by the Totality of Circumstances

Waiver-by-Acceptance Applies Equally to Publicly Subsidized and Private Tenancies; “Acceptance” Is a Fact Question Assessed by the Totality of Circumstances

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Waiver-by-Acceptance Applies Equally to Publicly Subsidized and Private Tenancies; “Acceptance” Is a Fact Question Assessed by the Totality of Circumstances Introduction In Hook & Ladder Apartments,...
Two-Track Specificity for Restitution Challenges: Minnesota Supreme Court Requires Offenders to Specify “Item” versus “Amount” under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(a) — State v. Seeman (2025)

Two-Track Specificity for Restitution Challenges: Minnesota Supreme Court Requires Offenders to Specify “Item” versus “Amount” under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(a) — State v. Seeman (2025)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Two-Track Specificity for Restitution Challenges: Minnesota Supreme Court Requires Offenders to Specify “Item” versus “Amount” under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(a) Introduction In State of...
When Legal Error Becomes Judicial Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts “Clear and Determined Law + Egregiousness” Test and Holds Rule 2.3(A) Requires Actual Bias

When Legal Error Becomes Judicial Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts “Clear and Determined Law + Egregiousness” Test and Holds Rule 2.3(A) Requires Actual Bias

Date: Sep 23, 2025
When Legal Error Becomes Judicial Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts “Clear and Determined Law + Egregiousness” Test and Holds Rule 2.3(A) Requires Actual Bias Introduction In Inquiry into...
“At Any Time” Means At Any Time: Minnesota High Court Allows Unlimited Window to Seek Withdrawal of TPR Admissions and Imposes Prima Facie Hearing Threshold

“At Any Time” Means At Any Time: Minnesota High Court Allows Unlimited Window to Seek Withdrawal of TPR Admissions and Imposes Prima Facie Hearing Threshold

Date: Sep 18, 2025
“At Any Time” Means At Any Time: Minnesota High Court Allows Unlimited Window to Seek Withdrawal of TPR Admissions and Imposes Prima Facie Hearing Threshold Decision: In the Matter of the Welfare of...
No Duty to Plead Around Affirmative Defenses: Minnesota Adopts “Unrebuttable Defense” Standard for Rule 12 Dismissals and Vacates Early Fee Awards

No Duty to Plead Around Affirmative Defenses: Minnesota Adopts “Unrebuttable Defense” Standard for Rule 12 Dismissals and Vacates Early Fee Awards

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Duty to Plead Around Affirmative Defenses: Minnesota Adopts “Unrebuttable Defense” Standard for Rule 12 Dismissals and Vacates Early Fee Awards Introduction In Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak, the...
Bright-Line Ban on Extra-Record Fact-Finding in Postconviction Proceedings: Structural Error Under the Minnesota Constitution (State v. Duol)

Bright-Line Ban on Extra-Record Fact-Finding in Postconviction Proceedings: Structural Error Under the Minnesota Constitution (State v. Duol)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Bright-Line Ban on Extra-Record Fact-Finding in Postconviction Proceedings: Structural Error Under the Minnesota Constitution Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Buay David Duol (Minn. Sept. 3,...
DuPont v. Commissioner: Minnesota Endorses Net-Income Apportionment for Hedging Receipts and Allows Denominator-Only Distortion Showing Under § 290.20

DuPont v. Commissioner: Minnesota Endorses Net-Income Apportionment for Hedging Receipts and Allows Denominator-Only Distortion Showing Under § 290.20

Date: Aug 28, 2025
DuPont v. Commissioner: Minnesota Endorses Net-Income Apportionment for Hedging Receipts and Allows Denominator-Only Distortion Showing Under § 290.20 Introduction In E. I. duPont de Nemours and...
State v. Lerma: Defendant-Requested Mistrial Precludes a Double Jeopardy Bar Absent Intentional Government Provocation; Judges Count as “Government” and No Implied Withdrawal

State v. Lerma: Defendant-Requested Mistrial Precludes a Double Jeopardy Bar Absent Intentional Government Provocation; Judges Count as “Government” and No Implied Withdrawal

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Consent Controls: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy After Defendant-Requested Mistrials Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Lerma, the Minnesota Supreme Court addressed when...
No Due Process Bar from Post-Discharge Statutory Change; Mens Rea Under Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2) Requires Knowledge of Prior Conviction, Not Knowledge of Status

No Due Process Bar from Post-Discharge Statutory Change; Mens Rea Under Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2) Requires Knowledge of Prior Conviction, Not Knowledge of Status

Date: Aug 28, 2025
No Due Process Bar from Post-Discharge Statutory Change; Mens Rea Under Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2) Requires Knowledge of Prior Conviction, Not Knowledge of Status Introduction In Joel Armen...
Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder

Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder...
Tribal Courts Recognized as “Jurisdictions” for Reciprocal Discipline; Minnesota Clarifies the RLPR 12(d) Analysis and Rejects Comity Weighting — In re Martins

Tribal Courts Recognized as “Jurisdictions” for Reciprocal Discipline; Minnesota Clarifies the RLPR 12(d) Analysis and Rejects Comity Weighting — In re Martins

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Tribal Courts Recognized as “Jurisdictions” for Reciprocal Discipline; Minnesota Clarifies the RLPR 12(d) Analysis and Rejects Comity Weighting Introduction In In re Petition for Disciplinary Action...
Preverdict Interest Under Minn. Stat. § 549.09: Settlement Offers Do Not Excuse the Two‑Year Commencement Rule; Interest Runs on the Net Judgment Excluding Collateral Sources

Preverdict Interest Under Minn. Stat. § 549.09: Settlement Offers Do Not Excuse the Two‑Year Commencement Rule; Interest Runs on the Net Judgment Excluding Collateral Sources

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Preverdict Interest Under Minn. Stat. § 549.09: Settlement Offers Do Not Excuse the Two‑Year Commencement Rule; Interest Runs on the Net Judgment Excluding Collateral Sources Introduction In Lee...
No Group Frisk Without Particularized Suspicion: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Terry Limits in In re Welfare of C.T.B. (2025)

No Group Frisk Without Particularized Suspicion: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Terry Limits in In re Welfare of C.T.B. (2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
No Group Frisk Without Particularized Suspicion: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Terry Limits in In re Welfare of C.T.B. (2025) Introduction In In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.T.B., 24 N.W.3d...
Direct Employee Recovery of Health-Insurer-Paid Medical Expenses and Extinguishment of Non‑Intervening Insurers’ Interests under Minnesota’s Workers’ Compensation Act

Direct Employee Recovery of Health-Insurer-Paid Medical Expenses and Extinguishment of Non‑Intervening Insurers’ Interests under Minnesota’s Workers’ Compensation Act

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Direct Employee Recovery of Health-Insurer-Paid Medical Expenses and Extinguishment of Non‑Intervening Insurers’ Interests under Minnesota’s Workers’ Compensation Act Introduction In Paula Kay...
No State Serial-Number Crime for Ghost Guns Absent a Federal Mandate: Minnesota Supreme Court Limits Minn. Stat. § 609.667(3) to Firearms Requiring Serial Numbers Under Federal Law

No State Serial-Number Crime for Ghost Guns Absent a Federal Mandate: Minnesota Supreme Court Limits Minn. Stat. § 609.667(3) to Firearms Requiring Serial Numbers Under Federal Law

Date: Aug 7, 2025
No State Serial-Number Crime for Ghost Guns Absent a Federal Mandate: Minnesota Supreme Court Limits Minn. Stat. § 609.667(3) to Firearms Requiring Serial Numbers Under Federal Law Introduction In...
State v. Nyonteh: Sleeping Jurors Are Not Juror Misconduct; Abuse-of-Discretion Standard Governs Removal

State v. Nyonteh: Sleeping Jurors Are Not Juror Misconduct; Abuse-of-Discretion Standard Governs Removal

Date: Jul 31, 2025
State v. Nyonteh: Sleeping Jurors Are Not Juror Misconduct; Abuse-of-Discretion Standard Governs Removal Introduction In State of Minnesota v. James Nyonteh, 24 N.W.3d 271 (Minn. 2025), the Minnesota...
Speak Now or Forfeit: Minnesota Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Preservation for Restitution Challenges and Narrows Use of the “Legal Authority” Exception

Speak Now or Forfeit: Minnesota Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Preservation for Restitution Challenges and Narrows Use of the “Legal Authority” Exception

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Speak Now or Forfeit: Minnesota Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Preservation for Restitution Challenges and Narrows Use of the “Legal Authority” Exception Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Erick...
Setting the Standard: Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Preliminary Denials Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aiding-and-Abetting Felony-Murder Relief Act

Setting the Standard: Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Preliminary Denials Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aiding-and-Abetting Felony-Murder Relief Act

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Setting the Standard: Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Preliminary Denials Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aiding-and-Abetting Felony-Murder Relief Act Case: State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert