Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Procedural Effect of Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation: Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Procedural Effect of Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation: Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Procedural Effect of Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation: Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of...
Denial of Allowance of Appeal Leaves Superior Court Order Intact; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions)

Denial of Allowance of Appeal Leaves Superior Court Order Intact; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Denial of Allowance of Appeal Leaves Superior Court Order Intact; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions) Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Eastern...
Allocatur Denial Does Not Create Precedent: Per Curiam Refusal to Review Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals (and Continuation of Sealing)

Allocatur Denial Does Not Create Precedent: Per Curiam Refusal to Review Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals (and Continuation of Sealing)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial Does Not Create Precedent: Per Curiam Refusal to Review Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals (and Continuation of Sealing) 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Sealing Continued

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Appeals; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This matter consists of numerous consolidated...
Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Appeals: Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continues

Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Appeals: Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continues

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Appeals: Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continues 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disposition concerns a...
Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Ruling Intact; Supplemental Record Becomes Moot; Sealing Continues (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions)

Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Ruling Intact; Supplemental Record Becomes Moot; Sealing Continues (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Ruling Intact; Supplemental Record Becomes Moot; Sealing Continues (Toll Brothers Consolidated Petitions) 1. Introduction This matter consists of numerous...
Rejecting a Return to Beauty Hall: Downstream Economic Harm and Burdened Transactions Support Associational Standing (Donohue, J., dissenting)

Rejecting a Return to Beauty Hall: Downstream Economic Harm and Burdened Transactions Support Associational Standing (Donohue, J., dissenting)

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Rejecting a Return to Beauty Hall: Downstream Economic Harm and Burdened Transactions Support Associational Standing (Donohue, J., dissenting) Case: D.M. and the Pennsylvania Cannabis Coalition v....
Child Support Civil Contempt: Enforcing Rule 1910.25 Financial Disclosures and Requiring Ability-to-Pay Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt for Coercive Imprisonment

Child Support Civil Contempt: Enforcing Rule 1910.25 Financial Disclosures and Requiring Ability-to-Pay Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt for Coercive Imprisonment

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Child Support Civil Contempt: Enforcing Rule 1910.25 Financial Disclosures and Requiring Ability-to-Pay Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt for Coercive Imprisonment I. Introduction Bredbenner v. Hall,...
Commonwealth v. Belgrave (Pa. 2026): Reversible Error When Prosecutor Calls a Known Recalcitrant Witness—Even Without an Express Fifth Amendment Invocation Before the Jury

Commonwealth v. Belgrave (Pa. 2026): Reversible Error When Prosecutor Calls a Known Recalcitrant Witness—Even Without an Express Fifth Amendment Invocation Before the Jury

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Reversible Error When Prosecutor Calls a Known Recalcitrant Witness—Even Without an Express Fifth Amendment Invocation Before the Jury Introduction In Commonwealth v. Belgrave (Pa. Mar. 26, 2026),...
Strickland Prejudice in Pennsylvania Capital Sentencing: When Failed Impeachment Undermines Proof of a Single, Morally Potent Aggravator

Strickland Prejudice in Pennsylvania Capital Sentencing: When Failed Impeachment Undermines Proof of a Single, Morally Potent Aggravator

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Strickland Prejudice in Pennsylvania Capital Sentencing: When Failed Impeachment Undermines Proof of a Single, Morally Potent Aggravator Case: Commonwealth v. Johnson (Pa. Supreme Court, Eastern...
Pennsylvania Constitution Bars Per Se Life-Without-Parole for Felony Murder Absent a Culpability Assessment

Pennsylvania Constitution Bars Per Se Life-Without-Parole for Felony Murder Absent a Culpability Assessment

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Pennsylvania Constitution Bars Per Se Life-Without-Parole for Felony Murder Absent a Culpability Assessment Introduction Commonwealth v. Lee arises from a 2014 home invasion in which Appellant Derek...
Post-Sentence SORNA II (Subchapter I) Constitutional Challenges Are Civil Actions Against PSP in Commonwealth Court—Not PCRA or Habeas in Common Pleas

Post-Sentence SORNA II (Subchapter I) Constitutional Challenges Are Civil Actions Against PSP in Commonwealth Court—Not PCRA or Habeas in Common Pleas

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Post-Sentence SORNA II (Subchapter I) Constitutional Challenges Are Civil Actions Against PSP in Commonwealth Court—Not PCRA or Habeas in Common Pleas 1. Introduction Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Arnett...
Section 311 Notice Does Not Require Sole Proprietors to Notify Insurers; Section 103 Controls and Section 401 Is Article IV–Limited

Section 311 Notice Does Not Require Sole Proprietors to Notify Insurers; Section 103 Controls and Section 401 Is Article IV–Limited

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Section 311 Notice Does Not Require Sole Proprietors to Notify Insurers; Section 103 Controls and Section 401 Is Article IV–Limited Case: Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. David Heater...
Newborn Dependency Venue Under Pa.R.J.C.P. 1300(A): A Child’s “Residence” May Follow the Parents When the Infant Has Never Left the Hospital (Justice Mundy, Concurring and Dissenting)

Newborn Dependency Venue Under Pa.R.J.C.P. 1300(A): A Child’s “Residence” May Follow the Parents When the Infant Has Never Left the Hospital (Justice Mundy, Concurring and Dissenting)

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Newborn Dependency Venue Under Pa.R.J.C.P. 1300(A): A Child’s “Residence” May Follow the Parents When the Infant Has Never Left the Hospital (Justice Mundy, Concurring and Dissenting) Case: In the...
Notice-and-Cure Procedure for CLE Noncompliance Leading to Administrative Suspension Under Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b)

Notice-and-Cure Procedure for CLE Noncompliance Leading to Administrative Suspension Under Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b)

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Notice-and-Cure Procedure for CLE Noncompliance Leading to Administrative Suspension Under Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b) Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Date: 2026-03-18 Subject: Administrative suspension...
Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2026): Ineffective Assistance at Capital Resentencing for Failure to Preserve Objections to Irrelevant, Unfairly Prejudicial “Serial Killer” Evidence

Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2026): Ineffective Assistance at Capital Resentencing for Failure to Preserve Objections to Irrelevant, Unfairly Prejudicial “Serial Killer” Evidence

Date: Mar 1, 2026
Ineffective Assistance at Capital Resentencing for Failure to Preserve Objections to Irrelevant, Unfairly Prejudicial “Serial Killer” Evidence Case: Commonwealth v. Smith, W. (Supreme Court of...
Pennsylvania Juvenile Delinquency Transfers: Two-Step Intercounty Acceptance, Record-Transmission Protocols, and Deadline Reset

Pennsylvania Juvenile Delinquency Transfers: Two-Step Intercounty Acceptance, Record-Transmission Protocols, and Deadline Reset

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Pennsylvania Juvenile Delinquency Transfers: Two-Step Intercounty Acceptance, Record-Transmission Protocols, and Deadline Reset Decision/Event: In Re: Order Amending Rules 200, 300, 302, and 630 of...
Section 8371 Bad-Faith Liability Does Not Extend to Surety Bonds (and the Limits of Binding Sureties to a Principal’s Arbitration Award)

Section 8371 Bad-Faith Liability Does Not Extend to Surety Bonds (and the Limits of Binding Sureties to a Principal’s Arbitration Award)

Date: Feb 21, 2026
Section 8371 Bad-Faith Liability Does Not Extend to Surety Bonds (and the Limits of Binding Sureties to a Principal’s Arbitration Award) 1) Introduction Eastern Steel Constructors, Inc. v....
Surety Bonds Are Not “Insurance” Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 8371; Non-Consenting Sureties Are Not Bound by Subcontract Arbitration Awards

Surety Bonds Are Not “Insurance” Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 8371; Non-Consenting Sureties Are Not Bound by Subcontract Arbitration Awards

Date: Feb 21, 2026
Surety Bonds Are Not “Insurance” Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 8371; Non-Consenting Sureties Are Not Bound by Subcontract Arbitration Awards Introduction Eastern Steel Constructors, Inc. (a subcontractor,...
Section 518(2) Finality: Only Orders that Actually Confirm/Modify/Change a Viewers’ Report (Not Pretrial Valuation Rulings) Are Immediately Appealable

Section 518(2) Finality: Only Orders that Actually Confirm/Modify/Change a Viewers’ Report (Not Pretrial Valuation Rulings) Are Immediately Appealable

Date: Feb 21, 2026
Section 518(2) Finality: Only Orders that Actually Confirm/Modify/Change a Viewers’ Report (Not Pretrial Valuation Rulings) Are Immediately Appealable Case: In Re: Condemnation by the City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert