Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

CVRA Mandamus Limits: No Merits Review of Rule 48 Dismissals; DPA Challenges Become Moot After Breach

CVRA Mandamus Limits: No Merits Review of Rule 48 Dismissals; DPA Challenges Become Moot After Breach

Date: Apr 4, 2026
CVRA Mandamus Limits: No Merits Review of Rule 48 Dismissals; DPA Challenges Become Moot After Breach 1. Introduction This consolidated mandamus proceeding arose from federal criminal proceedings...
Certified Canine “Alerts” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Establish Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances

Certified Canine “Alerts” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Establish Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Certified Canine “Alerts” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Establish Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances Introduction In United States v. Conchas-Mancilla (5th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026)...
Wesley v. Neal: Pleading and Procedure Thresholds in § 1983 Jail-Injury Litigation—Invalid Pro Se Service, Specificity for Supervisory/Training Liability, and “Substantial Harm” for Medical-Delay Claims

Wesley v. Neal: Pleading and Procedure Thresholds in § 1983 Jail-Injury Litigation—Invalid Pro Se Service, Specificity for Supervisory/Training Liability, and “Substantial Harm” for Medical-Delay Claims

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Wesley v. Neal: Pleading and Procedure Thresholds in § 1983 Jail-Injury Litigation—Invalid Pro Se Service, Specificity for Supervisory/Training Liability, and “Substantial Harm” for Medical-Delay...
Mortel v. Nowicki: Rejecting “Service by Acquiescence” and Affirming Dismissal for Nonappearance and Defective Service

Mortel v. Nowicki: Rejecting “Service by Acquiescence” and Affirming Dismissal for Nonappearance and Defective Service

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Mortel v. Nowicki: Rejecting “Service by Acquiescence” and Affirming Dismissal for Nonappearance and Defective Service Introduction In Mortel v. Nowicki (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2026) (per curiam)...
Parker v. Hooper: Immediate Appellate Review of Prison Reform Remedial Frameworks and Strict PLRA Compliance (Needs–Narrowness–Intrusiveness; Single, Judiciary-Funded Special Master)

Parker v. Hooper: Immediate Appellate Review of Prison Reform Remedial Frameworks and Strict PLRA Compliance (Needs–Narrowness–Intrusiveness; Single, Judiciary-Funded Special Master)

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Parker v. Hooper: Immediate Appellate Review of Prison Reform Remedial Frameworks and Strict PLRA Compliance (Needs–Narrowness–Intrusiveness; Single, Judiciary-Funded Special Master) 1. Introduction...
Post-Mullenix Use of Lytle: Fact-Specific Comparisons Can Clearly Establish Illegality of Shooting at a Fleeing Vehicle After the Threat Has Passed

Post-Mullenix Use of Lytle: Fact-Specific Comparisons Can Clearly Establish Illegality of Shooting at a Fleeing Vehicle After the Threat Has Passed

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Post-Mullenix Use of Lytle v. Bexar County: Fact-Specific Comparisons Can Clearly Establish Illegality of Shooting at a Fleeing Vehicle After the Threat Has Passed Case: Baker v. Coborn (5th Cir....
Trustee Commissions Exclude Surplus Paid to a “Stand-In” Debtor Under § 726(a)(6)

Trustee Commissions Exclude Surplus Paid to a “Stand-In” Debtor Under § 726(a)(6)

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Trustee Commissions Exclude Surplus Paid to a “Stand-In” Debtor Under § 726(a)(6) Case: Henderson v. US Trustee (In the Matter of VCR I, L.L.C.) | Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |...
Rule 58 Noncompliance Triggers a 180-Day Federal Appeal Window; Facial Prosecutor-Consultation Arrest Policies Require Monell “Deliberate Indifference” Pleading

Rule 58 Noncompliance Triggers a 180-Day Federal Appeal Window; Facial Prosecutor-Consultation Arrest Policies Require Monell “Deliberate Indifference” Pleading

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Rule 58 Noncompliance Triggers a 180-Day Federal Appeal Window; Facial Prosecutor-Consultation Arrest Policies Require Monell “Deliberate Indifference” Pleading Introduction In Prosper v. Harris...
Joint Venture Not Indispensable Under Rule 19 When All Venturers Are Parties; Individual Settlement Proceeds for JV Work Must Be Deposited to the JV Account

Joint Venture Not Indispensable Under Rule 19 When All Venturers Are Parties; Individual Settlement Proceeds for JV Work Must Be Deposited to the JV Account

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Joint Venture Not Indispensable Under Rule 19 When All Venturers Are Parties; Individual Settlement Proceeds for JV Work Must Be Deposited to the JV Account I. Introduction Archer Western...
Green v. HCTec Partners: Pretext Requires Evidence Supporting an Inference of Discrimination/Retaliation, Not Just Disagreement with the Employer’s Judgment

Green v. HCTec Partners: Pretext Requires Evidence Supporting an Inference of Discrimination/Retaliation, Not Just Disagreement with the Employer’s Judgment

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Green v. HCTec Partners: Pretext Requires Evidence Supporting an Inference of Discrimination/Retaliation, Not Just Disagreement with the Employer’s Judgment Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Texas Water Code Monopoly Policy Does Not Immunize Non‑CCN Municipal Vetoes Over Retail Water Service

Texas Water Code Monopoly Policy Does Not Immunize Non‑CCN Municipal Vetoes Over Retail Water Service

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Texas Water Code Monopoly Policy Does Not Immunize Non‑CCN Municipal Vetoes Over Retail Water Service 1. Introduction Megatel Homes, L.L.C. and Cipriani Island Laguna Azure, L.L.C. (collectively,...
Severing Magnuson-Stevens Council “Veto” Powers Eliminates Appointments Clause Defect and Limits Review to the Secretary’s Final Rule

Severing Magnuson-Stevens Council “Veto” Powers Eliminates Appointments Clause Defect and Limits Review to the Secretary’s Final Rule

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Severing Magnuson-Stevens Council “Veto” Powers Eliminates Appointments Clause Defect and Limits Review to the Secretary’s Final Rule Case: Bell v. Lutnick (consolidated with Arnesen/Bradley) — U.S....
Congious v. Shaw Commentary

Congious v. Shaw Commentary

Date: Apr 2, 2026
No Subjective Knowledge Without Proof of Review: Constructive-Notice “Mailbox Rule” Cannot Substitute for Deliberate-Indifference Awareness in Detainee Medical-Care Claims I. Introduction Congious v....
Batson Step-Three Must Turn on the Prosecutor’s “Actual, Contemporary Reasons”: Trial Courts May Not Supply New Justifications by Sua Sponte Voir Dire (United States v. Grace)

Batson Step-Three Must Turn on the Prosecutor’s “Actual, Contemporary Reasons”: Trial Courts May Not Supply New Justifications by Sua Sponte Voir Dire (United States v. Grace)

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Batson Step-Three Must Turn on the Prosecutor’s “Actual, Contemporary Reasons”: Trial Courts May Not Supply New Justifications by Sua Sponte Voir Dire (United States v. Grace) Court: United States...
Rule 19 and Joint Ventures: When All Venturers Are Parties, the JV Is Not Indispensable—and One Venturer’s Settlement Proceeds Are “JV Funds” If Paid for JV Work

Rule 19 and Joint Ventures: When All Venturers Are Parties, the JV Is Not Indispensable—and One Venturer’s Settlement Proceeds Are “JV Funds” If Paid for JV Work

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Rule 19 and Joint Ventures: When All Venturers Are Parties, the JV Is Not Indispensable—and One Venturer’s Settlement Proceeds Are “JV Funds” If Paid for JV Work Introduction Archer Western...
FOIA’s No-Creation Rule Applied to Email “Internet Headers”: Copy-and-Paste Extraction Is a New Record (Hagar v. FBI)

FOIA’s No-Creation Rule Applied to Email “Internet Headers”: Copy-and-Paste Extraction Is a New Record (Hagar v. FBI)

Date: Apr 2, 2026
FOIA’s No-Creation Rule Applied to Email “Internet Headers”: Copy-and-Paste Extraction Is a New Record (Hagar v. FBI) I. Introduction In Hagar v. FBI (5th Cir. Mar. 26, 2026), a pro se requester,...
Appeal Waivers Remain Enforceable Despite Sentencing-Court Misstatements About Preserved Constitutional Challenges (United States v. Pena)

Appeal Waivers Remain Enforceable Despite Sentencing-Court Misstatements About Preserved Constitutional Challenges (United States v. Pena)

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Appeal Waivers Remain Enforceable Despite Sentencing-Court Misstatements About Preserved Constitutional Challenges (United States v. Pena) 1. Introduction In United States v. Pena (5th Cir. Mar. 26,...
Open-and-Obvious Rule Bars Premises-Liability Recovery for Crossing Between Rail Cars Despite “Slack Action”

Open-and-Obvious Rule Bars Premises-Liability Recovery for Crossing Between Rail Cars Despite “Slack Action”

Date: Mar 31, 2026
Open-and-Obvious Rule Bars Premises-Liability Recovery for Crossing Between Rail Cars Despite “Slack Action” 1. Introduction Moten v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (5th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026) arises from a...
Fifth Circuit Narrows Interlocutory Review in Equity Receiverships: Only Completed Sales Orders Are Appealable; Settlement Approvals and Moot Sale Orders Are Dismissed

Fifth Circuit Narrows Interlocutory Review in Equity Receiverships: Only Completed Sales Orders Are Appealable; Settlement Approvals and Moot Sale Orders Are Dismissed

Date: Mar 31, 2026
Fifth Circuit Narrows Interlocutory Review in Equity Receiverships: Only Completed Sales Orders Are Appealable; Settlement Approvals and Moot Sale Orders Are Dismissed I. Introduction In SEC v....
Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in PPP-Fraud Conspiracies: Client Referrals, Kickback Control, and Personal Benefit

Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in PPP-Fraud Conspiracies: Client Referrals, Kickback Control, and Personal Benefit

Date: Mar 31, 2026
Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in PPP-Fraud Conspiracies: Client Referrals, Kickback Control, and Personal Benefit Introduction In United States v. Hudson (5th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026) (per curiam)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert