Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

General Gang-Structure Expert Testimony Survives Rule 704(b) (Post-Diaz) and Curative Instructions Defeat “Fear” and Co-Defendant-Plea Prejudice in MS-13 RICO/VICAR Trials

General Gang-Structure Expert Testimony Survives Rule 704(b) (Post-Diaz) and Curative Instructions Defeat “Fear” and Co-Defendant-Plea Prejudice in MS-13 RICO/VICAR Trials

Date: Apr 20, 2026
General Gang-Structure Expert Testimony Survives Rule 704(b) (Post-Diaz) and Curative Instructions Defeat “Fear” and Co-Defendant-Plea Prejudice in MS-13 RICO/VICAR Trials 1. Introduction In United...
Protective Sweep Scope, Gang-Trial Voir Dire Fear, and Limits on Gang Expert/Impeachment Evidence in RICO/VICAR Prosecutions (Sixth Cir.)

Protective Sweep Scope, Gang-Trial Voir Dire Fear, and Limits on Gang Expert/Impeachment Evidence in RICO/VICAR Prosecutions (Sixth Cir.)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Protective Sweep Scope, Gang-Trial Voir Dire Fear, and Limits on Gang Expert/Impeachment Evidence in RICO/VICAR Prosecutions (Sixth Cir.) 1. Introduction In United States v. Jorge Flores (24-5610);...
Pleading Fraud-Based Tortious Interference When a Manufacturer Induces Disclosure of Dealer Network Information; “Agreement” Under Michigan Farm Equipment Act Requires Mutual Assent Beyond Transitional Emails

Pleading Fraud-Based Tortious Interference When a Manufacturer Induces Disclosure of Dealer Network Information; “Agreement” Under Michigan Farm Equipment Act Requires Mutual Assent Beyond Transitional Emails

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Pleading Fraud-Based Tortious Interference When a Manufacturer Induces Disclosure of Dealer Network Information; “Agreement” Under Michigan Farm Equipment Act Requires Mutual Assent Beyond...
Sixth Circuit: “Excusable Neglect” Under FRAP 4(a)(5) Requires an Extraordinary Reason—Lead Counsel’s Pregnancy Does Not Excuse a Missed Appeal Deadline Where Co-Counsel Also Received Notice

Sixth Circuit: “Excusable Neglect” Under FRAP 4(a)(5) Requires an Extraordinary Reason—Lead Counsel’s Pregnancy Does Not Excuse a Missed Appeal Deadline Where Co-Counsel Also Received Notice

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Sixth Circuit: “Excusable Neglect” Under FRAP 4(a)(5) Requires an Extraordinary Reason—Lead Counsel’s Pregnancy Does Not Excuse a Missed Appeal Deadline Where Co-Counsel Also Received Notice I....
Rehabilitation Act Rule: No Failure-to-Accommodate Liability Absent an Accommodation Request—and No Accommodation Duty for “Regarded As” Disability

Rehabilitation Act Rule: No Failure-to-Accommodate Liability Absent an Accommodation Request—and No Accommodation Duty for “Regarded As” Disability

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Rehabilitation Act Rule: No Failure-to-Accommodate Liability Absent an Accommodation Request—and No Accommodation Duty for “Regarded As” Disability I. Introduction In Traniece Morgan v. Ohio Dep't of...
Qualified Immunity for “Compromise” Suicide-Prevention Decisions in Jail: No Clearly Established Deliberate Indifference Absent Factually Analogous Precedent

Qualified Immunity for “Compromise” Suicide-Prevention Decisions in Jail: No Clearly Established Deliberate Indifference Absent Factually Analogous Precedent

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Qualified Immunity for “Compromise” Suicide-Prevention Decisions in Jail: No Clearly Established Deliberate Indifference Absent Factually Analogous Precedent I. Introduction In David Lovell v. Cnty....
Technical Refusal to Bargain Does Not Confer § 9(d) Review of Decertification-Petition Dismissals That Preserve the Status Quo

Technical Refusal to Bargain Does Not Confer § 9(d) Review of Decertification-Petition Dismissals That Preserve the Status Quo

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Technical Refusal to Bargain Does Not Confer § 9(d) Review of Decertification-Petition Dismissals That Preserve the Status Quo 1. Introduction Case: Rieth-Riley Constr. Co., Inc. v. NLRB (6th Cir....
Technical Refusal to Bargain Cannot Create Appellate Jurisdiction to Review a Nonfinal Decertification-Petition Dismissal

Technical Refusal to Bargain Cannot Create Appellate Jurisdiction to Review a Nonfinal Decertification-Petition Dismissal

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Technical Refusal to Bargain Cannot Create Appellate Jurisdiction to Review a Nonfinal Decertification-Petition Dismissal Case: Rieth-Riley Constr. Co., Inc. v. NLRB (6th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026) Court:...
FCA Express False-Certification Liability Does Not Arise from Forward-Looking “Agrees to Comply” FTA Certifications

FCA Express False-Certification Liability Does Not Arise from Forward-Looking “Agrees to Comply” FTA Certifications

Date: Apr 16, 2026
FCA Express False-Certification Liability Does Not Arise from Forward-Looking “Agrees to Comply” FTA Certifications Introduction In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. GREGORY LYNN and PAULETTE...
Inevitable Discovery via Mandatory Tow-Triggered Inventory Search Despite Incomplete Inventory Paperwork (Sixth Circuit)

Inevitable Discovery via Mandatory Tow-Triggered Inventory Search Despite Incomplete Inventory Paperwork (Sixth Circuit)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Inevitable Discovery via Mandatory Tow-Triggered Inventory Search Despite Incomplete Inventory Paperwork Case: United States v. Arsenio Clayton (6th Cir. Apr. 10, 2026) (not recommended for...
Claim-by-Claim Fee Shifting and § 1927 Sanctions for Persisting in Frivolous Civil-Rights Theories

Claim-by-Claim Fee Shifting and § 1927 Sanctions for Persisting in Frivolous Civil-Rights Theories

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Claim-by-Claim Fee Shifting and § 1927 Sanctions for Persisting in Frivolous Civil-Rights Theories Case: Anthony Wynn v. City of Covington, Kentucky, et al. (6th Cir. Apr. 8, 2026) (unpublished)...
Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely If Made Before Negotiations Begin, Regardless of Contract-Modification Deadlines

Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely If Made Before Negotiations Begin, Regardless of Contract-Modification Deadlines

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely If Made Before Negotiations Begin, Regardless of Contract-Modification Deadlines Introduction Rieth-Riley Constr. Co. v. NLRB (6th Cir. Apr. 8,...
Qualified Immunity for Legislator Speech: No Clearly Established First Amendment “Adverse Action” Rule for a Councilmember’s Defamatory Remark During a Council Meeting

Qualified Immunity for Legislator Speech: No Clearly Established First Amendment “Adverse Action” Rule for a Councilmember’s Defamatory Remark During a Council Meeting

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Qualified Immunity for Legislator Speech: No Clearly Established First Amendment “Adverse Action” Rule for a Councilmember’s Defamatory Remark During a Council Meeting Case: Brian Menge v. Khursheed...
Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely if Notice Precedes the Start of Negotiations—Contract-Modification Deadlines Do Not Control Absent Commenced Bargaining

Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely if Notice Precedes the Start of Negotiations—Contract-Modification Deadlines Do Not Control Absent Commenced Bargaining

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Withdrawal from Multiemployer Bargaining Is Timely if Notice Precedes the Start of Negotiations—Contract-Modification Deadlines Do Not Control Absent Commenced Bargaining 1. Introduction Rieth-Riley...
Procedural Due Process Challenges to Michigan Lake-Level Amendments Require Concrete Harm and a State-Law Individual Entitlement

Procedural Due Process Challenges to Michigan Lake-Level Amendments Require Concrete Harm and a State-Law Individual Entitlement

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Procedural Due Process Challenges to Michigan Lake-Level Amendments Require Concrete Harm and a State-Law Individual Entitlement Case: Gregory Semack v. Roscommon Cnty., Mich. (6th Cir. Apr. 7, 2026)...
Precision Required: Exhaustion and Forfeiture Bar New or Unbriefed “Particular Social Group” Theories on Petition for Review

Precision Required: Exhaustion and Forfeiture Bar New or Unbriefed “Particular Social Group” Theories on Petition for Review

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Precision Required: Exhaustion and Forfeiture Bar New or Unbriefed “Particular Social Group” Theories on Petition for Review I. Introduction In Juan Gamas-Vicente v. Todd Blanche (6th Cir. Apr. 7,...
ERISA Preempts State PBM “Any-Willing-Provider” and Anti-Steering Incentive Restrictions that Dictate Pharmacy Network Design and Cost-Sharing

ERISA Preempts State PBM “Any-Willing-Provider” and Anti-Steering Incentive Restrictions that Dictate Pharmacy Network Design and Cost-Sharing

Date: Apr 9, 2026
ERISA Preempts State PBM “Any-Willing-Provider” and Anti-Steering Incentive Restrictions that Dictate Pharmacy Network Design and Cost-Sharing Case: McKee Foods Corp. v. BFP Inc. (6th Cir. Apr. 7,...
Hybrid Pro Se Defense: A Defendant’s Acquiescence to Standby Counsel’s Sidebar Participation Defeats Faretta/“Critical Stage” Claims

Hybrid Pro Se Defense: A Defendant’s Acquiescence to Standby Counsel’s Sidebar Participation Defeats Faretta/“Critical Stage” Claims

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Hybrid Pro Se Defense: A Defendant’s Acquiescence to Standby Counsel’s Sidebar Participation Defeats Faretta/“Critical Stage” Claims I. Introduction In United States v. Joseph Michael McNoriell...
Grand-Jury Indictment Presumption Controls § 1983 Retaliatory- and Malicious-Prosecution Claims; Lozman’s Probable-Cause Exception Does Not Extend to Retaliatory Prosecution

Grand-Jury Indictment Presumption Controls § 1983 Retaliatory- and Malicious-Prosecution Claims; Lozman’s Probable-Cause Exception Does Not Extend to Retaliatory Prosecution

Date: Apr 5, 2026
Grand-Jury Indictment Presumption Controls § 1983 Retaliatory- and Malicious-Prosecution Claims; Lozman’s Probable-Cause Exception Does Not Extend to Retaliatory Prosecution Introduction In John...
ERISA Fiduciary-Duty Claims Are Garmon-Barred When Liability Turns on an Unresolved NLRA Status-Quo Duty

ERISA Fiduciary-Duty Claims Are Garmon-Barred When Liability Turns on an Unresolved NLRA Status-Quo Duty

Date: Apr 5, 2026
ERISA Fiduciary-Duty Claims Are Garmon-Barred When Liability Turns on an Unresolved NLRA Status-Quo Duty I. Introduction In Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 324 (6th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert