Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Section 14-A SC/ST Act Appeal: Proceedings May Be Quashed Where the Charge-Sheet Rests on Materially Shifting Versions and Silent CCTV Evidence

Section 14-A SC/ST Act Appeal: Proceedings May Be Quashed Where the Charge-Sheet Rests on Materially Shifting Versions and Silent CCTV Evidence

Date: May 1, 2026
Section 14-A SC/ST Act Appeal: Proceedings May Be Quashed Where the Charge-Sheet Rests on Materially Shifting Versions and Silent CCTV Evidence 1. Introduction In Mahesh Tiwari v. State of U.P. and...
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC: Sudden Heat-of-Passion Assault Reduces Murder under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-I/149

Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC: Sudden Heat-of-Passion Assault Reduces Murder under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-I/149

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC: Sudden Heat-of-Passion Assault Reduces Murder under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-I/149 Introduction In Mahesh Singh And 3 Others v. State Of U.P., the Allahabad...
Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA

Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA Introduction In Dr Garima Dubey And 3 Others v. Dr. Saurabh Anand Dubey, the Allahabad High Court...
Conviction Sustainable on Credible Child Eye‑Witness Testimony Despite Delay, Hostile Witnesses, and Minor Section 313 CrPC Irregularities

Conviction Sustainable on Credible Child Eye‑Witness Testimony Despite Delay, Hostile Witnesses, and Minor Section 313 CrPC Irregularities

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Conviction Sustainable on Credible Child Eye‑Witness Testimony Despite Delay, Hostile Witnesses, and Minor Section 313 CrPC Irregularities Case: Tarsem Singh v. State Of U.P. Court: Allahabad High...
Exaggerated Income Claims in Section 125 Proceedings Do Not Automatically Justify Perjury Complaint: “Expedient in the Interests of Justice” as the Controlling Threshold under Section 340 CrPC / 379 BNSS

Exaggerated Income Claims in Section 125 Proceedings Do Not Automatically Justify Perjury Complaint: “Expedient in the Interests of Justice” as the Controlling Threshold under Section 340 CrPC / 379 BNSS

Date: Mar 14, 2026
Exaggerated Income Claims in Section 125 Proceedings Do Not Automatically Justify Perjury Complaint: “Expedient in the Interests of Justice” as the Controlling Threshold under Section 340 CrPC / 379...
Attachment under the U.P. Gangsters Act requires objective “reason to believe” and a proven nexus between offence-proceeds and property

Attachment under the U.P. Gangsters Act requires objective “reason to believe” and a proven nexus between offence-proceeds and property

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Attachment under the U.P. Gangsters Act requires objective “reason to believe” and a proven nexus between offence-proceeds and property 1. Introduction In Mansoor Ansari v. State of U.P. (Allahabad...
Bail in Serious Sexual-Offence Prosecutions: Victim’s No-Objection and Proposed Special Marriage as a Post-Release Bail-Cancellation Trigger

Bail in Serious Sexual-Offence Prosecutions: Victim’s No-Objection and Proposed Special Marriage as a Post-Release Bail-Cancellation Trigger

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Bail in Serious Sexual-Offence Prosecutions: Victim’s No-Objection and Proposed Special Marriage as a Post-Release Bail-Cancellation Trigger 1. Introduction In Mani Miraj Alias Ramdi Miraj Alam v....
Bail to a Foreign Undertrial in CGST Prosecution Despite Expired Visa: Embassy-Assured Presence, X-Misc Visa Framework, and a Bar on Citing Judges’ Names

Bail to a Foreign Undertrial in CGST Prosecution Despite Expired Visa: Embassy-Assured Presence, X-Misc Visa Framework, and a Bar on Citing Judges’ Names

Date: Feb 10, 2026
Bail to a Foreign Undertrial in CGST Prosecution Despite Expired Visa: Embassy-Assured Presence, X-Misc Visa Framework, and a Bar on Citing Judges’ Names 1. Introduction In Alice Lee @ Li Tengli v....
Working Wife Not Disentitled to Section 125 Cr.P.C. Maintenance: Disparity-in-Income and Matrimonial Standard-of-Living Test

Working Wife Not Disentitled to Section 125 Cr.P.C. Maintenance: Disparity-in-Income and Matrimonial Standard-of-Living Test

Date: Feb 6, 2026
Working Wife Not Disentitled to Section 125 Cr.P.C. Maintenance: Disparity-in-Income and Matrimonial Standard-of-Living Test 1. Introduction The decision in Ravinder Singh Bisht v. State of U.P. and...
Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P.

Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P. Case Title Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P. and Another Court High Court of...
Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P.

Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P. 1. Introduction The judgment in Prempal and 3 Others v. State...
Reaffirming Parity and Consistency in Bail Orders through Reference Judgments: Commentary on Furkan Ilahi v. State of U.P.

Reaffirming Parity and Consistency in Bail Orders through Reference Judgments: Commentary on Furkan Ilahi v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Reaffirming Parity and Consistency in Bail Orders through Reference Judgments: Commentary on Furkan Ilahi v. State of U.P. and Another Case: Furkan Ilahi v. State of U.P. and Another Court: High...
Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground – Commentary on Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground – Commentary on Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground Case: Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secretary (Home), Lucknow Court:...
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings Introduction In Chandrama Vishvakarma v....
Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Commentary on Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 23 Sept 2025)

Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Commentary on Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 23 Sept 2025)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Allahabad High Court in Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. and connected matters Introduction This consolidated...
Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment

Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment Introduction This commentary examines the Allahabad High Court’s...
Expeditious Disposal of Maintenance Proceedings under Article 227: Allahabad High Court Mandates “No Unnecessary Adjournments” and Short-Interval Hearings in Section 125 CrPC/Section 144 BNSS Cases

Expeditious Disposal of Maintenance Proceedings under Article 227: Allahabad High Court Mandates “No Unnecessary Adjournments” and Short-Interval Hearings in Section 125 CrPC/Section 144 BNSS Cases

Date: Sep 19, 2025
Expeditious Disposal of Maintenance Proceedings under Article 227: Allahabad High Court Mandates “No Unnecessary Adjournments” and Short-Interval Hearings in Section 125 CrPC/Section 144 BNSS Cases...
Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Family Settlement First: Hierarchy within Rule 109(5) for Partition (Kurra) under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 Case: Shahadat Ali and Another v. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow through Member...
“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC Commentary on Harendra Bansal & Anr. v. State of U.P. and Another (2025 AHC 144718) 1. Introduction The Allahabad High Court’s...
State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company v. State of U.P. (2025)

State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2025 AHC 143407) 1....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert