Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Andhra Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Interim Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases on Compelling Humanitarian Medical Grounds

Interim Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases on Compelling Humanitarian Medical Grounds

Date: Mar 19, 2026
Interim Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases on Compelling Humanitarian Medical Grounds (with Mandatory Surrender) 1. Introduction In MULAGAPAKA VENKATESH v. The State of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra...
Reversion for Ineligibility Upheld, but Pension Protected on Last Pay Drawn After Long Service (Non‑Precedential Equitable Relief)

Reversion for Ineligibility Upheld, but Pension Protected on Last Pay Drawn After Long Service (Non‑Precedential Equitable Relief)

Date: Mar 11, 2026
Reversion for Ineligibility Upheld, but Pension Protected on Last Pay Drawn After Long Service (Non‑Precedential Equitable Relief) 1. Introduction This common order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court...
Compassionate Appointees Must Be Considered for Eligible Higher Posts Under G.O.Ms.No.612; Promotion Circulars Cannot Defeat the Scheme

Compassionate Appointees Must Be Considered for Eligible Higher Posts Under G.O.Ms.No.612; Promotion Circulars Cannot Defeat the Scheme

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Compassionate Appointees Must Be Considered for Eligible Higher Posts Under G.O.Ms.No.612; Promotion Circulars Cannot Defeat the Scheme 1. Introduction This judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court...
LOCs in Matrimonial Offences: Article 21 Limits and OM 22.02.2021 “Exceptional Case” Threshold

LOCs in Matrimonial Offences: Article 21 Limits and OM 22.02.2021 “Exceptional Case” Threshold

Date: Feb 5, 2026
LOCs in Matrimonial Offences: Article 21 Limits and OM 22.02.2021 “Exceptional Case” Threshold 1. Introduction The Andhra Pradesh High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction, considered the legality of...
Promotees Filling Direct-Recruit Slots Cannot Claim Seniority Over Subsequent Direct Recruits; Seniority May Be Revised to Insert Direct Recruits at Cyclic Points (A. Srirangam Dora v. State of Andhra Pradesh)

Promotees Filling Direct-Recruit Slots Cannot Claim Seniority Over Subsequent Direct Recruits; Seniority May Be Revised to Insert Direct Recruits at Cyclic Points (A. Srirangam Dora v. State of Andhra Pradesh)

Date: Jan 21, 2026
Promotees Filling Direct-Recruit Slots Cannot Claim Seniority Over Subsequent Direct Recruits; Seniority May Be Revised to Insert Direct Recruits at Cyclic Points 1. Introduction In A. Srirangam Dora...
Five-Year Delay Not Always Fatal to Compassionate Appointment After Medical Decategorisation: Duty of the General Manager to Apply Mind to Financial Distress

Five-Year Delay Not Always Fatal to Compassionate Appointment After Medical Decategorisation: Duty of the General Manager to Apply Mind to Financial Distress

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Five-Year Delay Not Always Fatal to Compassionate Appointment After Medical Decategorisation: Duty of the General Manager to Apply Mind to Financial Distress 1. Introduction Case: Bora Narayanamma v....
State Largesse in Public Tenders: Mandatory Anti-Monopoly Tender Design by Restricting One Licence per Bidder (APSRTC Open Spaces)

State Largesse in Public Tenders: Mandatory Anti-Monopoly Tender Design by Restricting One Licence per Bidder (APSRTC Open Spaces)

Date: Jan 6, 2026
State Largesse in Public Tenders: Mandatory Anti-Monopoly Tender Design by Restricting One Licence per Bidder (APSRTC Open Spaces) Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati Judge: Hon’ble Mr....
Merit-cum-Roster Prevails Over “Final” Preferences in AP TRT Recruitment (Reading Down Rule 10, AP TRT Rules, 2025)

Merit-cum-Roster Prevails Over “Final” Preferences in AP TRT Recruitment (Reading Down Rule 10, AP TRT Rules, 2025)

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Merit-cum-Roster Prevails Over “Final” Preferences in AP TRT Recruitment (Reading Down Rule 10, AP TRT Rules, 2025) Case: Kamireddy Bhavani v. The State of Andhra Pradesh (Common Order in...
Section 245 A.P. Panchayat Raj Act: “Total Number of Members” for No-Confidence is the Voting-Eligible Effective Strength (Vacancies Excluded)

Section 245 A.P. Panchayat Raj Act: “Total Number of Members” for No-Confidence is the Voting-Eligible Effective Strength (Vacancies Excluded)

Date: Dec 25, 2025
Section 245 A.P. Panchayat Raj Act: “Total Number of Members” for No-Confidence is the Voting-Eligible Effective Strength (Vacancies Excluded) Case: D.Venkateswaramma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,...
Section 24(5) APVAT: Tax Department Must First Particularise Director’s Gross Neglect/Misfeasance Before Personal Recovery

Section 24(5) APVAT: Tax Department Must First Particularise Director’s Gross Neglect/Misfeasance Before Personal Recovery

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Section 24(5) APVAT: Tax Department Must First Particularise Director’s Gross Neglect/Misfeasance Before Personal Recovery 1. Introduction This common order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Division...

        National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition:
        Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Detailed Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court, 13...

        Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces:
        Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu (AP High Court, 07.11.2025)

Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces: Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu (AP High Court, 07.11.2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces: Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu I. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Judicial Prescription of a Time-Bound Admission Calendar for Law Courses in Andhra Pradesh: Commentary on Thandava Yogesh v. State of A.P.

Judicial Prescription of a Time-Bound Admission Calendar for Law Courses in Andhra Pradesh: Commentary on Thandava Yogesh v. State of A.P.

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Judicial Prescription of a Time-Bound Admission Calendar for Law Courses in Andhra Pradesh: A Detailed Commentary on Thandava Yogesh v. State of A.P. (AP High Court, 29 October 2025) 1. Introduction...
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund Introduction In A.S. No. 409...
Limited, Time‑Bound Police Protection for Removal of Lawfully Owned Goods During Industrial Agitations: AP High Court’s Direction with Cost-Sharing (Realme v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 18 Sep 2025)

Limited, Time‑Bound Police Protection for Removal of Lawfully Owned Goods During Industrial Agitations: AP High Court’s Direction with Cost-Sharing (Realme v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 18 Sep 2025)

Date: Sep 19, 2025
Limited, Time‑Bound Police Protection for Removal of Lawfully Owned Goods During Industrial Agitations: AP High Court’s Direction with Cost-Sharing Case: Realme Mobile Telecommunications (India) Pvt...
Concurrent Maintainability of Civil Damages with Criminal Prosecution and Mutual Adjustment of Compensation under Section 357 CrPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Bhavanam China Venkata Reddy v. Dantla Subba Reddy

Concurrent Maintainability of Civil Damages with Criminal Prosecution and Mutual Adjustment of Compensation under Section 357 CrPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Bhavanam China Venkata Reddy v. Dantla Subba Reddy

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Concurrent Maintainability of Civil Damages with Criminal Prosecution and Mutual Adjustment of Compensation under Section 357 CrPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court in Bhavanam China Venkata Reddy v. Dantla...
Section 31(2) clarified: Dissent as sufficient "reason" for omitted signature and validity of separate signed concurrence — Orind Special Refractories Ltd v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (AP High Court, 11 Sep 2025)

Section 31(2) clarified: Dissent as sufficient "reason" for omitted signature and validity of separate signed concurrence — Orind Special Refractories Ltd v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (AP High Court, 11 Sep 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Section 31(2) clarified: Dissent as sufficient "reason" for omitted signature and validity of separate signed concurrence — Orind Special Refractories Ltd v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (AP High Court,...
Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni Introduction In Viswa Hindu...
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection Court:...
“Presumption of Integrity in OMR-Based Examinations” – A Commentary on Dudekula Shameera v. Union of India (2025)

“Presumption of Integrity in OMR-Based Examinations” – A Commentary on Dudekula Shameera v. Union of India (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Presumption of Integrity in OMR-Based Examinations” – A Commentary on Dudekula Shameera v. Union of India, Andhra Pradesh High Court, 21 Jul 2025 1. Introduction The writ petition in Dudekula...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert