Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Article 324 Is Not a Licence for Blanket Mobility Bans: Calcutta High Court Limits Election-Era Motorcycle Restrictions to Statutory/SOP-Consistent, Proportionate Measures

Article 324 Is Not a Licence for Blanket Mobility Bans: Calcutta High Court Limits Election-Era Motorcycle Restrictions to Statutory/SOP-Consistent, Proportionate Measures

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Article 324 Is Not a Licence for Blanket Mobility Bans: Calcutta High Court Limits Election-Era Motorcycle Restrictions to Statutory/SOP-Consistent, Proportionate Measures Case: RITANKAR DAS v. STATE...
Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary

Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary Introduction In RAHUL VERMA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL, the...
Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference

Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference 1....
Continuity-of-Eligibility Principle in ART/Surrogacy: Age Limit Assessed with Reference to Timely Initiation and Completed Cryopreservation

Continuity-of-Eligibility Principle in ART/Surrogacy: Age Limit Assessed with Reference to Timely Initiation and Completed Cryopreservation

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Continuity-of-Eligibility Principle in ART/Surrogacy: Age Limit Assessed with Reference to Timely Initiation and Completed Cryopreservation 1. Introduction In SANGITA RAHA AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF...
Dismissal of BSF Personnel by Show-Cause (Without Security Force Court Trial) When Trial is Inexpedient/Impracticable Due to Civilian Involvement

Dismissal of BSF Personnel by Show-Cause (Without Security Force Court Trial) When Trial is Inexpedient/Impracticable Due to Civilian Involvement

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Dismissal of BSF Personnel by Show-Cause (Without Security Force Court Trial) When Trial is Inexpedient/Impracticable Due to Civilian Involvement 1. Introduction In Md. Farhad Zaman Vs. Union of...
Quashing 498A/406/506 Proceedings Against In-Laws on Omnibus Allegations and Medical Improbability: Section 482 Scrutiny Beyond the FIR

Quashing 498A/406/506 Proceedings Against In-Laws on Omnibus Allegations and Medical Improbability: Section 482 Scrutiny Beyond the FIR

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Quashing 498A/406/506 Proceedings Against In-Laws on Omnibus Allegations and Medical Improbability: Section 482 Scrutiny Beyond the FIR Case: MRIGESH KANTI NATH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND...
Acquittal Where Injured Witness Is Not a “Sterling Witness”: Conviction Under Sections 307/324/34 IPC Cannot Rest on Inconsistent Ocular Evidence Amid Investigative Lapses

Acquittal Where Injured Witness Is Not a “Sterling Witness”: Conviction Under Sections 307/324/34 IPC Cannot Rest on Inconsistent Ocular Evidence Amid Investigative Lapses

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Acquittal Where Injured Witness Is Not a “Sterling Witness”: Conviction Under Sections 307/324/34 IPC Cannot Rest on Inconsistent Ocular Evidence Amid Investigative Lapses Case: NABA KUMAR KOLEY v....
Section 357A CrPC is Time-Neutral: Victim Compensation Can Be Directed Even for Crimes Pre-Dating Its 2009 Insertion

Section 357A CrPC is Time-Neutral: Victim Compensation Can Be Directed Even for Crimes Pre-Dating Its 2009 Insertion

Date: Apr 7, 2026
Section 357A CrPC is Time-Neutral: Victim Compensation Can Be Directed Even for Crimes Pre-Dating Its 2009 Insertion 1) Introduction Case: SK BABUA @ SARIFUL SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL Court:...
Charge-Sheet Supersedes Section 156(3) Affidavit Lapse; “Public View” Turns on Visibility of the Act, Not Private Title

Charge-Sheet Supersedes Section 156(3) Affidavit Lapse; “Public View” Turns on Visibility of the Act, Not Private Title

Date: Apr 7, 2026
Charge-Sheet Supersedes Section 156(3) Affidavit Lapse; “Public View” Turns on Visibility of the Act, Not Private Title Court: Calcutta High Court (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction, Appellate Side)...
Irretrievable Breakdown as “Cruelty” Under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA (Post–Rakesh Raman) and the Necessity of a Section 25 HMA Application for Permanent Alimony

Irretrievable Breakdown as “Cruelty” Under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA (Post–Rakesh Raman) and the Necessity of a Section 25 HMA Application for Permanent Alimony

Date: Apr 7, 2026
Irretrievable Breakdown as “Cruelty” Under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA (Post–Rakesh Raman) and the Necessity of a Section 25 HMA Application for Permanent Alimony Case: SARANJIT KAUR (HURA) v. INDER SINGH...
IPC §363: “Lawful Guardian” Requires Proven Entrustment; Voluntary Accompaniment and Unproved Custody Defeat Kidnapping

IPC §363: “Lawful Guardian” Requires Proven Entrustment; Voluntary Accompaniment and Unproved Custody Defeat Kidnapping

Date: Apr 7, 2026
IPC §363: “Lawful Guardian” Requires Proven Entrustment; Voluntary Accompaniment and Unproved Custody Defeat Kidnapping Case: SK. SAMAD v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Calcutta High Court) Coram: Hon’ble...
498A Conviction Cannot Survive on Vague Allegations or a Misread “Dying Declaration” After 304B Acquittal

498A Conviction Cannot Survive on Vague Allegations or a Misread “Dying Declaration” After 304B Acquittal

Date: Mar 28, 2026
498A Conviction Cannot Survive on Vague Allegations or a Misread “Dying Declaration” After 304B Acquittal 1. Introduction In BOREN MONDAL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Calcutta High Court, decided on...
False Promise to Marry and “Misconception of Fact” Under Section 90 IPC: Conviction for Rape Cannot Stand Without Proof of Deceptive Intent From Inception, Especially Where Subsequent Marriage/Consensual Relationship Is Admitted

False Promise to Marry and “Misconception of Fact” Under Section 90 IPC: Conviction for Rape Cannot Stand Without Proof of Deceptive Intent From Inception, Especially Where Subsequent Marriage/Consensual Relationship Is Admitted

Date: Mar 28, 2026
False Promise to Marry and “Misconception of Fact” Under Section 90 IPC: Conviction for Rape Cannot Stand Without Proof of Deceptive Intent From Inception, Especially Where Subsequent...
Courts Will Not Compel Universities to Issue or Validate “Post‑Review” Marksheets That Do Not Tally With the Official Database

Courts Will Not Compel Universities to Issue or Validate “Post‑Review” Marksheets That Do Not Tally With the Official Database

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Courts Will Not Compel Universities to Issue or Validate “Post‑Review” Marksheets That Do Not Tally With the Official Database Case: ABHISHEK MISTRY v. THE WEST BENGAL STATE UNIVERSITY AND ORS Court:...
Non-obstante/Validating Clauses Cannot Nullify Final Tax Judgments; Only Prospective Six-Year Revision Survives (KMC Act s.179(2)(d))

Non-obstante/Validating Clauses Cannot Nullify Final Tax Judgments; Only Prospective Six-Year Revision Survives (KMC Act s.179(2)(d))

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Non-obstante/Validating Clauses Cannot Nullify Final Tax Judgments; Only Prospective Six-Year Revision Survives (KMC Act s.179(2)(d)) 1. Introduction In SAHUJAIN CHARITABLE SOCIETY AND ANR. v. THE...
Suspicious Non‑Magisterial Dying Declaration and Non‑Recording of Section 164 CrPC Statements: Acquittal in a Burn‑Death Prosecution

Suspicious Non‑Magisterial Dying Declaration and Non‑Recording of Section 164 CrPC Statements: Acquittal in a Burn‑Death Prosecution

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Suspicious Non‑Magisterial Dying Declaration and Non‑Recording of Section 164 CrPC Statements: Acquittal in a Burn‑Death Prosecution 1. Introduction In KADER MIA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Calcutta...
Trap-Evidence Corruption Prosecutions Not Quashed at Section 482 Stage Despite Alleged Breach of West Bengal ACB “Assignment & Preliminary Enquiry” Protocol

Trap-Evidence Corruption Prosecutions Not Quashed at Section 482 Stage Despite Alleged Breach of West Bengal ACB “Assignment & Preliminary Enquiry” Protocol

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Trap-Evidence Corruption Prosecutions Not Quashed at Section 482 Stage Despite Alleged Breach of West Bengal ACB “Assignment & Preliminary Enquiry” Protocol Case: SANDIP KUMAR ROY v. STATE OF WEST...
Section 175(3) BNSS: Magistrate’s “Inquiry” Must Be Conducted by the Magistrate (No Police-Delegation) and Must Test Cognizable Offence + Sufficient Ground to Investigate

Section 175(3) BNSS: Magistrate’s “Inquiry” Must Be Conducted by the Magistrate (No Police-Delegation) and Must Test Cognizable Offence + Sufficient Ground to Investigate

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Section 175(3) BNSS: Magistrate’s “Inquiry” Must Be Conducted by the Magistrate (No Police-Delegation) and Must Test Cognizable Offence + Sufficient Ground to Investigate Court: Calcutta High Court...
Procedural Fairness Under PMLA Section 8(1): Adjudicating Authority Must Decide “Relied Upon Documents” (RUDs) Disputes Before Proceeding Further

Procedural Fairness Under PMLA Section 8(1): Adjudicating Authority Must Decide “Relied Upon Documents” (RUDs) Disputes Before Proceeding Further

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Procedural Fairness Under PMLA Section 8(1): Adjudicating Authority Must Decide “Relied Upon Documents” (RUDs) Disputes Before Proceeding Further Case: DIPAK DE v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (W.P.A. No....
Election-Surveillance Tenders: Courts Will Not Dilute Experience Eligibility (Counting-Centre CCTV & GPS Tracking) Absent Arbitrariness or Mala Fides

Election-Surveillance Tenders: Courts Will Not Dilute Experience Eligibility (Counting-Centre CCTV & GPS Tracking) Absent Arbitrariness or Mala Fides

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Election-Surveillance Tenders: Courts Will Not Dilute Experience Eligibility (Counting-Centre CCTV & GPS Tracking) Absent Arbitrariness or Mala Fides 1) Introduction In M/s Innovatiview India Limited...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert