Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Chhattisgarh High Court Case Commentaries

Merit-cum-Seniority Requires a Real Comparative Merit Assessment; Seniority Is Only a Tiebreaker After Such Assessment

Merit-cum-Seniority Requires a Real Comparative Merit Assessment; Seniority Is Only a Tiebreaker After Such Assessment

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Merit-cum-Seniority Requires a Real Comparative Merit Assessment; Seniority Is Only a Tiebreaker After Such Assessment Case: S. S. TIGGA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Citation: 2026 CGHC 15280-DB Court:...
No Artificial Distinction on Common Evidence: Acquittal Reversal of a Principal Conspirator in a Joint Conspiracy Trial

No Artificial Distinction on Common Evidence: Acquittal Reversal of a Principal Conspirator in a Joint Conspiracy Trial

Date: Apr 3, 2026
No Artificial Distinction on Common Evidence: Acquittal Reversal of a Principal Conspirator in a Joint Conspiracy Trial 1. Introduction The Chhattisgarh High Court (Division Bench) decided a cluster...
Testimony of a Deaf-and-Dumb Rape Survivor as Substantive Evidence When Recorded with Court Safeguards

Testimony of a Deaf-and-Dumb Rape Survivor as Substantive Evidence When Recorded with Court Safeguards

Date: Mar 17, 2026
Testimony of a Deaf-and-Dumb Rape Survivor as Substantive Evidence When Recorded with Court Safeguards (Interpreter + Demonstrative Method) and Corroborated by Forensic Proof 1) Introduction The...
Section 90 Evidence Act Presumption Does Not Prove a Will: Strict Proof under Section 63(c) Succession Act and Section 68 Evidence Act; Limited Interference in Second Appeal

Section 90 Evidence Act Presumption Does Not Prove a Will: Strict Proof under Section 63(c) Succession Act and Section 68 Evidence Act; Limited Interference in Second Appeal

Date: Jan 30, 2026
Section 90 Evidence Act Presumption Does Not Prove a Will: Strict Proof under Section 63(c) Succession Act and Section 68 Evidence Act; Limited Interference in Second Appeal 1. Introduction The...
Compassionate Appointment: Attainment of Majority or Heirship Disputes Do Not Revive Time-Barred Claims Beyond Policy Limits

Compassionate Appointment: Attainment of Majority or Heirship Disputes Do Not Revive Time-Barred Claims Beyond Policy Limits

Date: Jan 23, 2026
Compassionate Appointment: Attainment of Majority or Heirship Disputes Do Not Revive Time-Barred Claims Beyond Policy Limits 1. Introduction The decision in Nijesh Chauhan v. State of Chhattisgarh...
No Blanket Institutional Preference in State PG Medical Admissions: Commentary on Dr. Samriddhi Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

No Blanket Institutional Preference in State PG Medical Admissions: Commentary on Dr. Samriddhi Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Date: Nov 26, 2025
No Blanket Institutional Preference in State PG Medical Admissions: Commentary on Dr. Samriddhi Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh 1. Introduction 1.1. Case Overview This commentary examines the judgment...
Uncommunicated Adverse ACRs May Support Compulsory Retirement: Limited Judicial Review of Subjective Satisfaction

Uncommunicated Adverse ACRs May Support Compulsory Retirement: Limited Judicial Review of Subjective Satisfaction

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Uncommunicated Adverse ACRs May Support Compulsory Retirement: Limited Judicial Review of Subjective Satisfaction 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court in RAJENDRA KUMAR...
Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year Case: Nanakchand Agrawal v. The Income Tax...
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi A Detailed Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani @ Anil Swami v. Smt. Shradha Tiwari (2025 CGHC 41430-DB) 1. Introduction In August 2025, the...
Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025)

Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of...
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths Commentary on Prema Haththel v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 CGHC 23811-DB) 1. Introduction The Chhattisgarh High Court’s division bench decision in...
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025) — Re-affirmation of the “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine in Departmental Enquiries 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS

Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in ABC v. Anil Kumar (2025:CGHC:17987),...
No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability

No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability

Date: Apr 19, 2025
No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability Introduction The case of Ram Prasad Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025:CGHC:17141) arose out...
Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent

Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent Introduction The case of Kavilas v. State of Chhattisgarh presents a significant judicial determination where the...
Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions

Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions

Date: Apr 10, 2025
Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in Chhattisgarh State...
Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments

Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments Introduction The decision in Smt. Dukhiya Bai v. Punjab National Bank (2025: CGHC: 15605‑DB) clarifies the scope of...
Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas

Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in Bilaspur Lokhit Sanskritik...
New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations

New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations

Date: Apr 2, 2025
New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations 1. Introduction Shubham Sinha v. The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (2025: CGHC:15226‑DB) is a...
Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables

Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables Introduction This judgment arises from an intra‐Court appeal by...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert