Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold

Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold 1. Introduction...
Mutual Exclusivity of Cheating (Section 420 IPC) and Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 406 IPC) in Job-Procurement Fraud

Mutual Exclusivity of Cheating (Section 420 IPC) and Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 406 IPC) in Job-Procurement Fraud

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Mutual Exclusivity of Cheating (Section 420 IPC) and Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 406 IPC) in Job-Procurement Fraud 1) Introduction Case: Rameshchandra v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh (2026...
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: “May Earn” vs “Is Earning”—Qualified Wife Entitled Absent Proof of Income; Streedhan Not a Defence; Modification under BNSS §145

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: “May Earn” vs “Is Earning”—Qualified Wife Entitled Absent Proof of Income; Streedhan Not a Defence; Modification under BNSS §145

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: “May Earn” vs “Is Earning”—Qualified Wife Entitled Absent Proof of Income; Streedhan Not a Defence; Modification under BNSS §145 1) Introduction The decision in...
Section 494 IPC and Muslim Polygamy: Bigamy Requires a “Void” Second Marriage—Charge Quashable Where Muslim Personal Law Permits Second Marriage

Section 494 IPC and Muslim Polygamy: Bigamy Requires a “Void” Second Marriage—Charge Quashable Where Muslim Personal Law Permits Second Marriage

Date: Mar 19, 2026
Section 494 IPC and Muslim Polygamy: Bigamy Requires a “Void” Second Marriage—Charge Quashable Where Muslim Personal Law Permits Second Marriage Case: Mohd. Arif Ahmad Jahagir Khan v. The State Of...
Alienations in Violation of Interim Injunction Are “Non-est”: Broad Coercive Powers Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Alienations in Violation of Interim Injunction Are “Non-est”: Broad Coercive Powers Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Date: Mar 12, 2026
Alienations in Violation of Interim Injunction Are “Non-est”: Broad Coercive Powers Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC 1) Introduction Case: Ram Swaroop v. Harimohan Singh (Madhya Pradesh High Court,...
Prolonged Consensual Relationship & Knowledge of Subsisting Marriage: Quashing BNS §69 FIR Under BNSS §528

Prolonged Consensual Relationship & Knowledge of Subsisting Marriage: Quashing BNS §69 FIR Under BNSS §528

Date: Mar 12, 2026
Prolonged Consensual Relationship & Knowledge of Subsisting Marriage: Quashing BNS §69 FIR Under BNSS §528 Case: Varun Pratap Singh v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh (2026 MPHC-JBP 19601) Court: Madhya...
False “No Charges Framed” Disclosure in Form 26 as Corrupt Practice (Undue Influence) — Election Set Aside and Runner-Up Declared Elected

False “No Charges Framed” Disclosure in Form 26 as Corrupt Practice (Undue Influence) — Election Set Aside and Runner-Up Declared Elected

Date: Mar 10, 2026
False “No Charges Framed” Disclosure in Form 26 as Corrupt Practice (Undue Influence) — Election Set Aside and Runner-Up Declared Elected 1) Introduction The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Gwalior Bench)...
Acquittal on Benefit of Doubt Does Not Bar Police Dismissal in Departmental Proceedings; Writ Review Confined to Decision-Making Process

Acquittal on Benefit of Doubt Does Not Bar Police Dismissal in Departmental Proceedings; Writ Review Confined to Decision-Making Process

Date: Feb 25, 2026
Acquittal on Benefit of Doubt Does Not Bar Police Dismissal in Departmental Proceedings; Writ Review Confined to Decision-Making Process 1. Introduction In Sultan Singh Nagar v. The State Of Madhya...
Post-bail detention of a foreign national in an authorized detention centre pending trial is not “illegal detention” for Habeas Corpus; High Court may instead direct time-bound trial

Post-bail detention of a foreign national in an authorized detention centre pending trial is not “illegal detention” for Habeas Corpus; High Court may instead direct time-bound trial

Date: Feb 24, 2026
Post-bail detention of a foreign national in an authorized detention centre pending trial is not “illegal detention” for Habeas Corpus; High Court may instead direct time-bound trial 1. Introduction...
Strict Enforcement of Rule 16 (MP Conditions of Practice Rules, 2012): Appearance Bar for Advocates Convicted of Criminal Contempt Unless Contempt is Purged

Strict Enforcement of Rule 16 (MP Conditions of Practice Rules, 2012): Appearance Bar for Advocates Convicted of Criminal Contempt Unless Contempt is Purged

Date: Feb 24, 2026
Strict Enforcement of Rule 16 (MP Conditions of Practice Rules, 2012): Appearance Bar for Advocates Convicted of Criminal Contempt Unless Contempt is Purged 1) Introduction Case: Munendra Singh v....
Minimal Interference under Articles 226/227 in Labour Court Awards Upholding Domestic Enquiries Governed by Private Service Rules

Minimal Interference under Articles 226/227 in Labour Court Awards Upholding Domestic Enquiries Governed by Private Service Rules

Date: Feb 20, 2026
Minimal Interference under Articles 226/227 in Labour Court Awards Upholding Domestic Enquiries Governed by Private Service Rules Case: Prayagnarayan v. Principal Scindia School Fort Gwalior...
Stamp Duty on Mining Leases: Computation on Average Annual Royalty as on Date of Execution; No Addition of Dead Rent/Upkar; No Term-Multiplication or Penalty for Bona Fide Presentation

Stamp Duty on Mining Leases: Computation on Average Annual Royalty as on Date of Execution; No Addition of Dead Rent/Upkar; No Term-Multiplication or Penalty for Bona Fide Presentation

Date: Feb 20, 2026
Stamp Duty on Mining Leases: Computation on Average Annual Royalty as on Date of Execution; No Addition of Dead Rent/Upkar; No Term-Multiplication or Penalty for Bona Fide Presentation 1....
Marital Status Cannot Defeat a Nominated/Only Legal Heir’s Claim to Ex‑Gratia and Leave Encashment in Service Death Benefits

Marital Status Cannot Defeat a Nominated/Only Legal Heir’s Claim to Ex‑Gratia and Leave Encashment in Service Death Benefits

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Marital Status Cannot Defeat a Nominated/Only Legal Heir’s Claim to Ex‑Gratia and Leave Encashment in Service Death Benefits Case: Prasanna Namdev (Soni) v. The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh And...
Bail to Medical Practitioners: Jacob Mathew Screening Not Attracted Where a Competent Authority Complains and the Doctor Allegedly Prescribes a Banned Fixed-Dose Syrup Despite Prior Toxicity Warning

Bail to Medical Practitioners: Jacob Mathew Screening Not Attracted Where a Competent Authority Complains and the Doctor Allegedly Prescribes a Banned Fixed-Dose Syrup Despite Prior Toxicity Warning

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Bail to Medical Practitioners: Jacob Mathew Screening Not Attracted Where a Competent Authority Complains and the Doctor Allegedly Prescribes a Banned Fixed-Dose Syrup Despite Prior Toxicity Warning...
Right to Summon Forensic/DNA Experts Despite Section 293 CrPC and “Fast-Track” Disposal Directions

Right to Summon Forensic/DNA Experts Despite Section 293 CrPC and “Fast-Track” Disposal Directions

Date: Feb 14, 2026
Right to Summon Forensic/DNA Experts Despite Section 293 CrPC and “Fast-Track” Disposal Directions 1. Introduction Case: Avinash Pandey v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh and Others (Madhya Pradesh High...
Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before High Level Technical Committee in Municipal Drainage Works

Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before High Level Technical Committee in Municipal Drainage Works

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing Before High Level Technical Committee in Municipal Drainage Works 1. Introduction This order arises out of WP No. 13962 of 2024 (NIDHI PANDE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE...
PIL Limits in Executive Welfare Schemes: Courts Will Not Reopen Registrations or Recast Eligibility Absent Clear Unconstitutionality

PIL Limits in Executive Welfare Schemes: Courts Will Not Reopen Registrations or Recast Eligibility Absent Clear Unconstitutionality

Date: Feb 11, 2026
PIL Limits in Executive Welfare Schemes: Courts Will Not Reopen Registrations or Recast Eligibility Absent Clear Unconstitutionality 1. Introduction In Paras Saklecha v. State Of Madhya Pradesh...
Withheld Investigation Material and Fabricated Section 27 Memoranda: Acquittal in a Circumstantial Case

Withheld Investigation Material and Fabricated Section 27 Memoranda: Acquittal in a Circumstantial Case

Date: Feb 10, 2026
Withheld Investigation Material and Fabricated Section 27 Memoranda: Acquittal in a Circumstantial Case Case: Kamlesh Bai Kushwaha v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh (2026 MPHC-JBP 11261) Court: High...
Recognition of Maternity/Child-Care Accommodation for Female Students: Attendance Relaxation to Prevent Educational Disadvantage

Recognition of Maternity/Child-Care Accommodation for Female Students: Attendance Relaxation to Prevent Educational Disadvantage

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Recognition of Maternity/Child-Care Accommodation for Female Students: Attendance Relaxation to Prevent Educational Disadvantage 1. Introduction The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Jabalpur), in Rumaisa...
Irregular (Not Illegal) District Court Class-III Appointments Made Pre-Rules Cannot Be Reopened After Decades; Mansukh Lal Saraf Applies Only to Illegal Appointments

Irregular (Not Illegal) District Court Class-III Appointments Made Pre-Rules Cannot Be Reopened After Decades; Mansukh Lal Saraf Applies Only to Illegal Appointments

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Irregular (Not Illegal) District Court Class-III Appointments Made Pre-Rules Cannot Be Reopened After Decades; Mansukh Lal Saraf Applies Only to Illegal Appointments 1) Introduction This common order...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert