Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

De Facto Arrest Starts the 24-Hour Clock: Section 58 BNSS/Article 22(2) Runs from First Coercive Restraint, Not Arrest Memo Time

De Facto Arrest Starts the 24-Hour Clock: Section 58 BNSS/Article 22(2) Runs from First Coercive Restraint, Not Arrest Memo Time

Date: Apr 17, 2026
De Facto Arrest Starts the 24-Hour Clock: Section 58 BNSS/Article 22(2) Runs from First Coercive Restraint, Not Arrest Memo Time 1) Introduction In ANUJ KUMAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA (Punjab &...
Bail for Ancillary Crypto-Conversion Role in Cyber-Fraud Cases under Section 483 BNSS: Restitution Offer, Limited Role, and Stringent Digital-Trace Conditions

Bail for Ancillary Crypto-Conversion Role in Cyber-Fraud Cases under Section 483 BNSS: Restitution Offer, Limited Role, and Stringent Digital-Trace Conditions

Date: Apr 11, 2026
Bail for Ancillary Crypto-Conversion Role in Cyber-Fraud Cases under Section 483 BNSS: Restitution Offer, Limited Role, and Stringent Digital-Trace Conditions 1. Introduction In VIKRAM SINGH v. STATE...
PMLA Bail: Evasive Conduct and Accused-Attributed Delay Defeat Article 21 Plea; Section 45 Rigour Not Diluted by Parity

PMLA Bail: Evasive Conduct and Accused-Attributed Delay Defeat Article 21 Plea; Section 45 Rigour Not Diluted by Parity

Date: Apr 9, 2026
PMLA Bail: Evasive Conduct and Accused-Attributed Delay Defeat Article 21 Plea; Section 45 Rigour Not Diluted by Parity Case: Dharam Singh Chhoker v. Directorate of Enforcement (Punjab & Haryana High...
Anticipatory Bail in High-Value Cyber Fraud: Societal Impact and Custodial Interrogation as Decisive Factors

Anticipatory Bail in High-Value Cyber Fraud: Societal Impact and Custodial Interrogation as Decisive Factors

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Anticipatory Bail in High-Value Cyber Fraud: Societal Impact and Custodial Interrogation as Decisive Factors 1. Introduction In AAYUSH MALHOTRA v. STATE OF HARYANA (Punjab & Haryana High Court,...
Bail in Espionage/National Security FIRs: Disclosure-Only Allegations and Pending Official Secrets Act Sanction as Decisive Factors

Bail in Espionage/National Security FIRs: Disclosure-Only Allegations and Pending Official Secrets Act Sanction as Decisive Factors

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Bail in Espionage/National Security FIRs: Disclosure-Only Allegations and Pending Official Secrets Act Sanction as Decisive Factors Case: DAVENDER SINGH ALIAS DAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA...
Just Compensation in Injury Claims: Income Guesswork, Functional Disability, Future Prospects, and Stepped-Up Interest

Just Compensation in Injury Claims: Income Guesswork, Functional Disability, Future Prospects, and Stepped-Up Interest

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Just Compensation in Injury Claims: Income Guesswork, Functional Disability, Future Prospects, and Stepped-Up Interest Case: ALAM v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. & ANR Court: Punjab & Haryana...
Quashing Rape FIR Under Section 482 CrPC Where Allegations Reveal a Prolonged Consensual Relationship and No Evidence of Coercion/Blackmail

Quashing Rape FIR Under Section 482 CrPC Where Allegations Reveal a Prolonged Consensual Relationship and No Evidence of Coercion/Blackmail

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Quashing Rape FIR Under Section 482 CrPC Where Allegations Reveal a Prolonged Consensual Relationship and No Evidence of Coercion/Blackmail 1. Introduction This decision of the Punjab & Haryana High...
Ultra Vires Sub-Delegation: Registrar-Made 1997 Cooperative Service Rules Cannot Be Enforced to Claim Retiral Benefits

Ultra Vires Sub-Delegation: Registrar-Made 1997 Cooperative Service Rules Cannot Be Enforced to Claim Retiral Benefits

Date: Mar 6, 2026
Ultra Vires Sub-Delegation: Registrar-Made 1997 Cooperative Service Rules Cannot Be Enforced to Claim Retiral Benefits Case: SAMARJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS (with connected CWPs) Court:...
Regular Bail in Delayed-Homicide Prosecution: Call-Detail Reliance, Completed Complainant Testimony, and Women’s Consideration under Section 480 BNSS

Regular Bail in Delayed-Homicide Prosecution: Call-Detail Reliance, Completed Complainant Testimony, and Women’s Consideration under Section 480 BNSS

Date: Feb 28, 2026
Regular Bail in Delayed-Homicide Prosecution: Call-Detail Reliance, Completed Complainant Testimony, and Women’s Consideration under Section 480 BNSS Case: SEEMA SAINI v. STATE OF HARYANA Court:...
Vice-Chancellor Must Supply Board of Discipline Recommendations and Grant Post-Recommendation Hearing Before Expulsion

Vice-Chancellor Must Supply Board of Discipline Recommendations and Grant Post-Recommendation Hearing Before Expulsion

Date: Feb 28, 2026
Vice-Chancellor Must Supply Board of Discipline Recommendations and Grant Post-Recommendation Hearing Before Expulsion 1. Introduction In MUNISH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. (Punjab & Haryana High...
Quashing of Forgery/Cheating FIR in Land Agreements Where a Registered Instrument Shows No Apparent Alteration and the Dispute Is Essentially Civil

Quashing of Forgery/Cheating FIR in Land Agreements Where a Registered Instrument Shows No Apparent Alteration and the Dispute Is Essentially Civil

Date: Feb 24, 2026
Quashing of Forgery/Cheating FIR in Land Agreements Where a Registered Instrument Shows No Apparent Alteration and the Dispute Is Essentially Civil 1. Introduction In PARVEEN NAIN AND OTHERS v. STATE...
Judicially Mandated Video-Scrutiny of Police Parade Tests Where Selection Fairness Is Disputed

Judicially Mandated Video-Scrutiny of Police Parade Tests Where Selection Fairness Is Disputed

Date: Feb 4, 2026
Judicially Mandated Video-Scrutiny of Police Parade Tests Where Selection Fairness Is Disputed 1. Introduction In Seema Rani v. State of Haryana And Others (Punjab & Haryana High Court, decided on...
Arbitrary Withdrawal of Regular Appointment to a Disabled Employee Triggers Notional Regularization and Consequential Retiral/Ex‑Gratia Benefits

Arbitrary Withdrawal of Regular Appointment to a Disabled Employee Triggers Notional Regularization and Consequential Retiral/Ex‑Gratia Benefits

Date: Feb 4, 2026
Arbitrary Withdrawal of Regular Appointment to a Disabled Employee Triggers Notional Regularization and Consequential Retiral/Ex‑Gratia Benefits 1. Introduction This common order of the Punjab &...
Advocate-Party Status Alone Is Not Ground for Transfer Under Section 24 CPC: Requirement of Specific, Reasonable Apprehension of Unfair Trial

Advocate-Party Status Alone Is Not Ground for Transfer Under Section 24 CPC: Requirement of Specific, Reasonable Apprehension of Unfair Trial

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Advocate-Party Status Alone Is Not Ground for Transfer Under Section 24 CPC: Requirement of Specific, Reasonable Apprehension of Unfair Trial 1. Introduction The Punjab & Haryana High Court (Justice...
Writ Jurisdiction is Normally Barred Against Emergency Closure/Disconnection Directions Under the Water Act Where an NGT Remedy Exists; Reasons Need Only Be Recorded in Writing

Writ Jurisdiction is Normally Barred Against Emergency Closure/Disconnection Directions Under the Water Act Where an NGT Remedy Exists; Reasons Need Only Be Recorded in Writing

Date: Jan 24, 2026
Writ Jurisdiction is Normally Barred Against Emergency Closure/Disconnection Directions Under the Water Act Where an NGT Remedy Exists; Reasons Need Only Be Recorded in Writing 1. Introduction The...
ART Act Section 21(g) Imposes Individual (Gender-wise) Age Limits, Not Couple-wise; Donor Oocyte IVF Permissible and No “One Living Child” Bar

ART Act Section 21(g) Imposes Individual (Gender-wise) Age Limits, Not Couple-wise; Donor Oocyte IVF Permissible and No “One Living Child” Bar

Date: Jan 23, 2026
ART Act Section 21(g) Imposes Individual (Gender-wise) Age Limits, Not Couple-wise; Donor Oocyte IVF Permissible and No “One Living Child” Bar 1. Introduction In SARBJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF...
Quo Warranto to Challenge a State Advocate General Lies Only for Lack of Article 165 Eligibility; Alleged Impropriety is Outside Quo Warranto Review

Quo Warranto to Challenge a State Advocate General Lies Only for Lack of Article 165 Eligibility; Alleged Impropriety is Outside Quo Warranto Review

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Quo Warranto to Challenge a State Advocate General Lies Only for Lack of Article 165 Eligibility; Alleged Impropriety is Outside Quo Warranto Review 1. Introduction In Pradeep Singh Advocate v. State...
Time-Bound Disability Certificate Valid Till Superannuation Suffices for Section 20 Protection and Supernumerary Retention

Time-Bound Disability Certificate Valid Till Superannuation Suffices for Section 20 Protection and Supernumerary Retention

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Time-Bound Disability Certificate Valid Till Superannuation Suffices for Section 20 Protection and Supernumerary Retention 1. Introduction In BRIJ BHUSHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS (Punjab &...
Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana

Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana 1. Introduction The judgment of...
Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab

Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab and Others 1. Introduction The decision of the Punjab & Haryana High...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert