Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Recovery for “Missing Stock” Requires Due Disciplinary Procedure and a Speaking Order—Mere Physical Verification and Show-Cause Are Insufficient

Recovery for “Missing Stock” Requires Due Disciplinary Procedure and a Speaking Order—Mere Physical Verification and Show-Cause Are Insufficient

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Recovery for “Missing Stock” Requires Due Disciplinary Procedure and a Speaking Order—Mere Physical Verification and Show-Cause Are Insufficient 1. Introduction In ASHOK KUMAR SAINI v. R S R T C AND...
Allowances and Family-Benefit Perks Form Part of “Income” for Motor Accident Dependency Compensation

Allowances and Family-Benefit Perks Form Part of “Income” for Motor Accident Dependency Compensation

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Allowances and Family-Benefit Perks Form Part of “Income” for Motor Accident Dependency Compensation Case: PRIYANKA AND OTHERS v. SWARN SINGH AND OTHERS, [2026:RJ-JP:15844] Court: Rajasthan High...
Illegal Daily-Wage Engagement Under the 1999 Act Still Requires Section 25-F Compliance for Termination

Illegal Daily-Wage Engagement Under the 1999 Act Still Requires Section 25-F Compliance for Termination

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Illegal Daily-Wage Engagement Under the 1999 Act Still Requires Section 25-F Compliance for Termination 1. Introduction In SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYAT THATED v. SHRI BANSHI LAL S/O SHRI MODULAL THROUGH...
Anticipatory Bail in “Digital Arrest” Cyber-Frauds: Compromise Cannot Dilute Societal-Impact Offences; High Court May Invoke Inherent Powers to Expedite Interim Release of Recovered Money to an Aged Victim

Anticipatory Bail in “Digital Arrest” Cyber-Frauds: Compromise Cannot Dilute Societal-Impact Offences; High Court May Invoke Inherent Powers to Expedite Interim Release of Recovered Money to an Aged Victim

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Anticipatory Bail in “Digital Arrest” Cyber-Frauds: Compromise Cannot Dilute Societal-Impact Offences; High Court May Invoke Inherent Powers to Expedite Interim Release of Recovered Money to an Aged...
Contractual Service Termination by Non‑State Public-Function Bodies Not Amenable to Writ: “Public Law Element” as the Maintainability Threshold

Contractual Service Termination by Non‑State Public-Function Bodies Not Amenable to Writ: “Public Law Element” as the Maintainability Threshold

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Contractual Service Termination by Non‑State Public-Function Bodies Not Amenable to Writ: “Public Law Element” as the Maintainability Threshold 1) Introduction In Atal Khandelwal v. Institute of...
Article 21 Limits on “Deposit of Fine” Conditions While Suspending Sentence: Poverty Cannot Convert a Suspension Order into Continued Custody

Article 21 Limits on “Deposit of Fine” Conditions While Suspending Sentence: Poverty Cannot Convert a Suspension Order into Continued Custody

Date: Jan 25, 2026
Article 21 Limits on “Deposit of Fine” Conditions While Suspending Sentence: Poverty Cannot Convert a Suspension Order into Continued Custody Case: RAJESH KUSHWAH S/O SHRI RAMSHAKAL KUSHWAH v. STATE...
Family Pension Entitlement of a “Nata Patni”: Nomination Not Determinative When Marital Status is Established

Family Pension Entitlement of a “Nata Patni”: Nomination Not Determinative When Marital Status is Established

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Family Pension Entitlement of a “Nata Patni”: Nomination Not Determinative When Marital Status is Established 1. Introduction The decision in RAM PYARI SUMAN W/O LATE SHRI PURAN LAL SAINI v. THE...
Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (2025)

Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (2025)

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 RJ‑JP 49452 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur...
Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan

Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan I. Introduction The Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)...
Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan

Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: A Detailed Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 RJ-JP 48775 Court: High Court of Judicature for...
Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan

Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan...
Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur...
No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

Date: Nov 17, 2025
No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Larger Bench reference on converting arrest warrants to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences Introduction In Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Swroop Sharma...
Cross-Examination as a Non-Derogable Fair-Trial Right: Liberal Recall of Key Prosecution Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC When Opportunity Is Closed Without Just Cause

Cross-Examination as a Non-Derogable Fair-Trial Right: Liberal Recall of Key Prosecution Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC When Opportunity Is Closed Without Just Cause

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Cross-Examination as a Non-Derogable Fair-Trial Right: Liberal Recall of Key Prosecution Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC When Opportunity Is Closed Without Just Cause 1. Introduction In POORANMAL...
Attempt to Rape Not a “Heinous Offence” for Juveniles under JJ Act, 2015 – Commentary on K S/o P v. State of Rajasthan

Attempt to Rape Not a “Heinous Offence” for Juveniles under JJ Act, 2015 – Commentary on K S/o P v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Attempt to Rape Not a “Heinous Offence” for Juveniles under JJ Act, 2015: Commentary on K S/o P v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 RJ‑JP 42985 I. Introduction This commentary examines the judgment of the...
Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation

Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation Case: Ashok Kumar...
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration Introduction This...
Bail in Bailable Offences Is an Inviolable Right under BNSS: Rajasthan High Court condemns mechanical remand and mandates accountability for unlawful arrests

Bail in Bailable Offences Is an Inviolable Right under BNSS: Rajasthan High Court condemns mechanical remand and mandates accountability for unlawful arrests

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Bail in Bailable Offences Is an Inviolable Right under BNSS: Rajasthan High Court condemns mechanical remand and mandates accountability for unlawful arrests Case Comment on: Meetu Pareek W/o Shri...
Pre-decisional Hearing Is Mandatory Before Removing Gram Panchayat Administrators Appointed After Dissolution: Rajasthan High Court’s Due Process Mandate under Section 38, Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

Pre-decisional Hearing Is Mandatory Before Removing Gram Panchayat Administrators Appointed After Dissolution: Rajasthan High Court’s Due Process Mandate under Section 38, Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

Date: Aug 19, 2025
State of Rajasthan (2025 RJ-JP 31054), holding that pre-decisional hearing is mandatory before removal of Panchayat Administrators appointed after dissolution, and reiterating constitutional...
Custodial Absence and Back-Pay After Acquittal – The Harbajan Singh Rule

Custodial Absence and Back-Pay After Acquittal – The Harbajan Singh Rule

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Custodial Absence and Back-Pay After Acquittal – The Harbajan Singh Rule 1. Introduction Harbajan Singh v. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer (2025 RJ-JP 31247) is a seminal pronouncement of the...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert