Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Uttarakhand High Court Case Commentaries

Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity

Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity Case: HEMU PANT @ HEMU KALU AND ANOTHER...
Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing

Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing 1. Introduction In MOHD DANISH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (Uttarakhand High Court, decided...
Saved 1991 Police Appeal Rules Cannot Impose Limitation Where Uttarakhand Police Act, 2007 Prescribes None

Saved 1991 Police Appeal Rules Cannot Impose Limitation Where Uttarakhand Police Act, 2007 Prescribes None

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Saved 1991 Police Appeal Rules Cannot Impose Limitation Where Uttarakhand Police Act, 2007 Prescribes None Introduction In Pradeep Singh Bhauryal Constable No. 3554 v. Deputy Inspector of P.A.C....
Rehabilitation-Oriented Relocation from Riverbeds Is Not “Punitive Action” Under the 2018 Moratorium

Rehabilitation-Oriented Relocation from Riverbeds Is Not “Punitive Action” Under the 2018 Moratorium

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Rehabilitation-Oriented Relocation from Riverbeds Is Not “Punitive Action” Under the 2018 Moratorium Case: RAJESHWARI YADAV GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (Uttarakhand High Court, 01-04-2026) |...
Family Pensioners Under State Health Schemes Cannot Be Treated as “Dependents” for Age-Barred Medical Reimbursement; State Bound by Scheme Coverage and Deductions

Family Pensioners Under State Health Schemes Cannot Be Treated as “Dependents” for Age-Barred Medical Reimbursement; State Bound by Scheme Coverage and Deductions

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Family Pensioners Under State Health Schemes Cannot Be Treated as “Dependents” for Age-Barred Medical Reimbursement; State Bound by Scheme Coverage and Deductions 1. Introduction The Uttarakhand High...
Matrimonial Suspicion and Discord Alone Do Not Amount to “Abetment of Suicide” Under Section 306 IPC Without Mens Rea and a Proximate Instigating Act

Matrimonial Suspicion and Discord Alone Do Not Amount to “Abetment of Suicide” Under Section 306 IPC Without Mens Rea and a Proximate Instigating Act

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Matrimonial Suspicion and Discord Alone Do Not Amount to “Abetment of Suicide” Under Section 306 IPC Without Mens Rea and a Proximate Instigating Act 1. Introduction The Uttarakhand High Court, in...
Forensic DNA Evidence Must Be Supported by a Proved Chain of Custody; Kidnapping Applies to a Major with Intellectual Disability as a “Person of Unsound Mind”

Forensic DNA Evidence Must Be Supported by a Proved Chain of Custody; Kidnapping Applies to a Major with Intellectual Disability as a “Person of Unsound Mind”

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Forensic DNA Evidence Must Be Supported by a Proved Chain of Custody; Kidnapping Applies to a Major with Intellectual Disability as a “Person of Unsound Mind” 1. Introduction The Uttarakhand High...
Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025) 1. Introduction In Birendra Singh Nabiyal and Others v. State of...
Uttarakhand High Court Reaffirms Principle of Non-Interference with Ongoing Electoral Processes

Uttarakhand High Court Reaffirms Principle of Non-Interference with Ongoing Electoral Processes

Date: Jan 17, 2025
Uttarakhand High Court Reaffirms Principle of Non-Interference with Ongoing Electoral Processes Introduction In the case of Shobha Joshi v. State of Uttarakhand, decided on January 16, 2025, by the...
Uttarakhand High Court Affirms Prospective Fee Determination Rule in Private Professional Education

Uttarakhand High Court Affirms Prospective Fee Determination Rule in Private Professional Education

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Uttarakhand High Court Affirms Prospective Fee Determination Rule in Private Professional Education 1. Introduction In the case of Bindiya Khatri v. State of Uttarakhand (2025:UHC:344), a group of...
Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle

Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision of the Uttarakhand High Court in the...
State’s Authority to Regulate Private Unaided Schools’ Fee Structure during Emergencies

State’s Authority to Regulate Private Unaided Schools’ Fee Structure during Emergencies

Date: Jan 3, 2025
State’s Authority to Regulate Private Unaided Schools’ Fee Structure during Emergencies 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Uttarakhand High Court Judgment in “Welham Boys School Society...
Teacher Definition and Superannuation: DR S P GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Teacher Definition and Superannuation: DR S P GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Date: Mar 15, 2024
Teacher Definition and Superannuation: DR S P GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Introduction The case of DR S P GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND pertains to the dispute over the classification of Dr....
Prospective Amendment of Recruitment Rules Does Not Prejudice Existing Candidates: Om Prakash Gaur v. State of Uttarakhand

Prospective Amendment of Recruitment Rules Does Not Prejudice Existing Candidates: Om Prakash Gaur v. State of Uttarakhand

Date: Apr 1, 2022
Prospective Amendment of Recruitment Rules Does Not Prejudice Existing Candidates: Om Prakash Gaur v. State of Uttarakhand Introduction The case of Om Prakash Gaur & another v. State of Uttarakhand...
Locus Standi in Administrative Tribunals: Insights from Union of India v. Associations of Class I Officers

Locus Standi in Administrative Tribunals: Insights from Union of India v. Associations of Class I Officers

Date: Jan 9, 2020
Locus Standi in Administrative Tribunals: Insights from Union of India v. Associations of Class I Officers Introduction The case of Union of India and Another v. Associations of Class I (Group A)...
Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement

Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement

Date: Apr 13, 2019
Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. Judgment: Clarifying Section 44BB on Service Tax Reimbursement 1. Introduction The case of Director of Income Tax v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Inclusion of Married Daughters in Compassionate Appointment Policies: A Landmark Decision by Uttarakhand High Court

Inclusion of Married Daughters in Compassionate Appointment Policies: A Landmark Decision by Uttarakhand High Court

Date: Mar 28, 2019
Inclusion of Married Daughters in Compassionate Appointment Policies: A Landmark Decision by Uttarakhand High Court Introduction The case of Udham Singh Nagar District Cooperative Bank Ltd. and...
Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH

Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH

Date: Apr 27, 2018
Clarifying Ratio Decidendi in Pension Eligibility: Insights from STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH Introduction The case of STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER v. BRAHM PAL SINGH,...
Strengthening Dowry Death Protections: Uttarakhand HC Rules in State v. Devendra Singh & Others

Strengthening Dowry Death Protections: Uttarakhand HC Rules in State v. Devendra Singh & Others

Date: Sep 15, 2017
Strengthening Dowry Death Protections: Uttarakhand High Court's Ruling in State v. Devendra Singh & Others Introduction The case of State v. Devendra Singh & Others (Uttarakhand High Court, 14th...
Exclusion of Separate Levies from Excise Duty Exemption: Insights from Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Union Of India

Exclusion of Separate Levies from Excise Duty Exemption: Insights from Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Mar 17, 2017
Exclusion of Separate Levies from Excise Duty Exemption: Insights from Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Union Of India serves as a pivotal examination of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert